SBG Nation Provides Your Daily Source for Half-Baked Crap

Weekend Chatter

Posted by SBG on Saturday, December 9th, 2006 at 8:42 am

Talk amongst yourselves. Here are some topics.

  • SI has a new power poll ranking NBA players. Number 5 is KG.

    Kevin Garnett
    If someone was to present to you a roster that included Mark Blount, Mike James and Ricky Davis in its starting lineup, alongside a rotation that featured heavy minutes for Troy Hudson, you'd probably assume it to be among the league's worst defensive outfits. Instead, the 103 points for every hundred possessions Minnesota is giving up ranks third in the NBA. KG is why. Though he's had help from Trenton Hassell and Marko Jaric (!), KG has been all over the place defensively for his 8-9 Timberwolves.

    That was before he shut down number 8 Carlos Boozer

  • Andy Pettitte signs with the Yankees for $16 million. Rocket next? If those two guys come in and pitch well, we could hear about Derek Jeter's leadership even more next post season. Then again, if Pettitte is hurt or goes into decline, I wonder if anyone will mention that the Yankees are paying him as much as they are paying A-Rod. Doubt it.
  • The Allen Iverson thing has got the league atwitter. He's apparently out in Philly, will he come to Minny? I wouldn't mind it -- but I can't see how the T-Wolves have the package to get him. Apparently, it starts with Foye and James, or if you listen to Marc Stein, Foye and Davis. Okay, where are the other $10 million coming from? Troy Hudson and Marko Jaric? While the thought of losing those guys is enticing, if Iverson would get hurt, who plays?

    Iverson has three years left on his deal at a ton of money, but hell, those guys suck. Plus, KG and Iverson could lure someone with a mid-level exception next year. Iverson and Rickey Davis would be a pair of ball hogs, but Alley I would throw the ball to KG, I think, once in a while. I'm for it. I'm for it because I don't think the Wolves have anything outside of KG to trade, so if they can dump some driftwood for AI, they should do it.

    The NY Times reports that Iverson has indicated that a trade to Minnesota, where he would be with forward Kevin Garnett, would be attractive to him. Both are former M.V.P.’s who have never won a championship. The Timberwolves are said to be dangling Troy Hudson (making $6 million) and may have to include the rookie Randy Foye. Hudson for Iverson! They'd love Huddy in Philly! Knott.

  • Last night, Lucy and I went out for a little late night snack to a place called Bonfire in Eagan. They have live music there sometimes, I think on weekend nights. Anyway, there was a guy singing in a Joe Cocker meets Lou Reed voice. I mean, cut back to four packs a day, dude! He was singing "Something" by the Beatles. I suppose some would like to hear that, but I was thinking about the original with George Harrison and I'm saying that if he's going to sing Beatles songs, he ought to stick with the Ringo numbers. Doing a little research on that number, I found that it's reportedly the only Beatles song that Frank Sinatra ever performed.
  • Speaking of which, it was 26 years ago yesterday that John Lennon was killed. I didn't find out about it until the next morning. I turned on the radio and Imagine was on the radio. After the song was over, I heard the news. It's hard to believe that that much time has gone by. I've never been a huge Beatles fan, but recently this photo has been on my mind.
    Beatles.jpg

    I find this image to be stunning. I just really like it. This photograph is just about as old as I am. At the time, I'm sure it was viewed as a great PR shot, but now it looks like an iconic image of a time that is now long passed and never to return.

    I guess as I was sitting there last night listening to a bad rendition of a Beatles tune I further realized that I'm getting old. I don't want to hear new popular music. I want to listen to the old stuff. I want to turn it to the oldies station. I never succumbed to the country music thing, thank God, but I'll listen to the '60s music forever, thank you very much.

  • In actuality, I'm too young to remember the Beatles. I was only about five or so when they broke up, so I never heard their albums as they were released. I don't really remember the Stones when they were THE STONES, you know, making albums that could make you just smile with appreciation. In one sense, I guess that I was born late. Maybe being born in 1946 would have been a good thing. Then again, had I been born in 1946, I might have died over in Vietnam. So, I guess I'll take being born at a time when the Stones and Beatles were gripping the world. I'll appreciate the music and realize that I was lucky to have missed out on that disaster.

This entry was posted by SBG on Saturday, December 9th, 2006 at 8:42 am and is filed under Cup of Coffee, Minnesota Timberwolves, NBA. It is one of 2393 entries by the author. We are no longer accepting Letters to the Editor on this post. Why?

14 LTEs

New Britain Bo
New Britain Bo replied on December 9th, 2006 at 2:18 pm

I don’t want to hear new popular music

I would direct th' Stick to reggaeton - when we go to PR I like to tune in to the fast-paced, sexy yet positive riffs o': Daddy Yanquis, Don Omar, Wisin & Yandel (just to name a few).

Also, you need to track on th' Canadian indie trax. Follow Grant Lawrence and his podcasts on cbcradio3 (I think avail on satellite, but I get free weekly on iTunes). Good stuff.

 
Nick N.
Nick N. replied on December 9th, 2006 at 3:58 pm

As I hear it, the main obstacle toward the Wolves acquiring Iverson is not that they could not piece together a sufficient package, but an issue of money. Said Glen Taylor:

"No trade," Taylor said during the Wolves' 110-103 victory over Utah on Friday night at Target Center. "It isn't that I don't like him. Just money-wise, it wouldn't work out."

That's really not the case, because if the Wolves really wanted to, they could put together a package that would offset the salary issues. Bringing in AI would put fans in the seats, but McHale and Taylor seem more content with giving absurd contracts to crappy players that nobody wants to watch.

Gotta love those Wolves.

 
Dread Pirate Will Young
WillYoung replied on December 9th, 2006 at 4:04 pm

So, I clicked on this link to learn more about Iverson's potential trade destinations and I was struck with a severe sense of, I guess, deja vu.

SBG
SBG replied on December 9th, 2006 at 4:31 pm

It has a familiar feeling, to be sure. I can not quite put my finger on it.... :)

 
 
ubelmann
ubelmann replied on December 9th, 2006 at 4:06 pm

The Yankees' offseason has been scary-good. I mean, I guess they probably haven't improved the team by leaps and bounds, but every move has been solid.

-- Moved Jaret Wright for a moderately useful reliever

-- Moved Sheffield (and his attitude) for a really high-risk, high-upside, young pitching prospect, along with a couple of guys who project to be cheap relievers in the future

-- Signed Mike Mussina (one of the ten best pitchers in the AL last year) to a ridiculously cheap $22M/2yr contract

-- Signed Andy Pettite to a short-term contract. Pettite was solid last year in the NL, and even if he declines quickly, the Yanks didn't give up any long-term value to get him (Houston didn't even bother offering Pettite arbitration, so the Yanks don't even lose draft picks)

-- Picked up Josh Phelps in the Rule 5 draft to cheaply fill a bench spot

Now that Cashman is being intelligent about cheaply filling bench roles and middle relief spots, that opens up more payroll for them to outbid other teams by offering contracts with not as many years, but more money per year.

 
ubelmann
ubelmann replied on December 9th, 2006 at 6:17 pm

File under "you're back with me, leather":

Don't forget the other trade front: New ball for leather ball.

In the latest strong signal that commissioner David Stern is seriously considering a ball swap just three months into the new microfiber composite ball's first season, league sources tell ESPN.com that all 30 teams were due to received calls by Friday from Stern staffers. NBA officials want to know how many leather balls each team has in storage from last season, in case the decision to switch comes quickly.

Teams were allotted 75 new synthetic basketballs at the start of the season, but Stern has acknowledged that the cuts various players are suffering while handling the microfiber version could force him to make a surprising in-season recall of the old ball ... which might include emergency orders with Spalding for teams that have little or nothing left from last season's leather shipment.

The league is the only source I've heard from that thinks the new balls really are a good idea. It's somewhat bizarre for me to think that a team gets allotted 75 balls for an entire season when teams prepare as many as a gross of baseballs for any one game.

brianS
brianS replied on December 10th, 2006 at 12:30 am

Who the hell is Stern's technical adviser, Donald Rumsfeld?? This is utterly ridiculous. Not even the NCAA would make a major rules/equipment change without thorough testing.

ubelmann
ubelmann replied on December 10th, 2006 at 6:41 pm

Yeah, this is exactly the sort of thing that you could use the D-League for, too. I know that the NHL, especially, tests a lot of their proposed rule changes in their minor leagues before they enact them in the NHL--and rule changes are arguably less important than equipment changes. At least the bizarre issue of the ball cutting the players would get caught in the D-League so that it could presumably be fixed before the new ball hit the NBA.

SBG
SBG replied on December 10th, 2006 at 7:06 pm

Good answer. David Stern rules the NBA with an iron fist. He does what he wants. For whatever reason, he wanted this ball. I don't know why. I am also pretty astonished that players are getting cuts from the ball. I mean, what is this composite? Glass?

 
 
 
brink
brink replied on December 10th, 2006 at 5:55 pm

Wait, "cuts various players are suffering"? Did I read correctly? The ball is CUTTING players? What in the world?

By the way, I can't help but think that this synthetic ball was just a "New Coke" stunt to boost sales of a sagging product. ;-)

ubelmann
ubelmann replied on December 10th, 2006 at 6:38 pm

This is the first place I've heard of the ball cutting the players. I've heard all kinds of stuff about it being more difficult to handle and bouncing in strange ways, though. You would think that they'd know whether or not the ball would cut the players before they pressed it into service.

 
 
 
brianS
brianS replied on December 10th, 2006 at 12:49 am

Why isn't Indiana involved in these Iverson rumors? I mean, my GAWD, things are getting ugly in Indy! It's just got to be killing Donnie Walsh and the Basketball Jesus to have to deal with such dysfunction.

I'm imagining ways in which Walsh could manage to unload nutcase Stephen Jackson on somebody.

 
E-6
E-6 replied on December 10th, 2006 at 1:58 am

The Chairman absolutely butchers "Yesterday" on his My Way LP from '69.

SBG
SBG replied on December 10th, 2006 at 2:25 am

It's a good thing I said reportedly with a link. Thanks for the info.

 
 

Sorry, The WGOM is no longer accepting Letters to the Editor on this article.

=