What To Do With That Paper
Posted by SBG on Monday, February 26th, 2007 at 9:40 pm
I just got home a few minutes ago and I went onto the deck, grabbed a bottle of beer, popped it into my bottle couzie and sat down at the computer. So, yes, I’ll admit that I was having a brewski while writing this post. However, since I started writing this before I started drinking the beer and because the idea for this post was in my head before I wrote it, I wouldn’t say that the post is alcohol fueled or anything. Besides, even if I’d drunk the whole thing first, at my size it’s gonna take more than a bottle of beer to get me to the point where I’m babbling incoherently (or at least because of the alcohol).
It seems that everyone these days is self-absorbed. I mean, Gleeman’s got the ear thing going on, and Reusse, well we know that he’s written a few columns that were alcohol fueled back in the day – and I’m beginning to wonder if his latest diatribe wasn’t ghost written by Johnny Walker. I’m a big fan of Reusse – hell I stole the name “Stick and Ball Guy” from one of his columns – but it’s pretty apparent that he doesn’t think much of me or my kind. I suppose you could call Reusse a little bit of a blogger bigot. That’s a little disappointing – I’ve always thought that Ol’ Pat was a good guy. But, he’s got a stereotypical image of a blogger as being some loser writing in his undershorts in Mom’s basement. I might write a few columns in my undershorts, but the woman in this place isn’t my mother. Although, you’d never know it sometimes the way she bosses me around. Good grief. Let me give you an example. On Sunday mornings, I have to go and get a copy of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. I don’t read the Strib – in print, that is. Hell, that woman needs her paper. I read it online.
I’m like the Strib’s worst nightmare. I never pay for their product, but I get it all the same from their free webpage. But, my mother wife, no, she’s still well within the clutches of the old Strib business model. Curses! I got shell out $1.75 every Sunday and my reward is watching my wife rifle through the eight bazillion ads, plotting ways to spend every Bertin’ cent we have until we are living in a ditch outside a garbage incinerator or something.
Well, the Strib has figured out that in order to stay alive, they are going to have to do something other than hope freeloaders like myself will stop reading their newspaper in the tubes. So, they have had to resort to other, non-traditional means to raise revenue and interest in their product. Interestingly, they are the first industry in America to ever have to do something like this in the face of a technological revolution or from competition from new and previously unforeseen sources. Patrick Reusse is absolutely correct to decry bloggers. Heavens! We wouldn’t want the populace engaged in the creation and dissemination of information. Some of it might be inaccurate. Better off leaving such tasks to the professionals.
So, I got this stupid copy of the paper on Sunday.
Okay, I’m gonna go off on a rant. It turns out that the Strib has a sports columnist named Sid Hartman. Now, Sid never graduated from college. Hell, he never even graduated from high school. These days, a high school dropout usually ends up working at McDonald’s or something. Of course, if you aren’t up for that, working as a sports columnist is always an option. Anyway, I read Sid’s insight on the T-Wolves. Most everyone who looks at the T-Wolves says that the Wolves’ biggest problem is the amateurish way that the front office has run the franchise. Most people would say that the Wolves roster is filled with marginal players at best that the front office has handed outrageous contracts. In fact, I’m of the belief that it’s almost impossible to f*** up a roster more than what Kevin McHale has done in Minnesota (unless your name is Isiah Thomas). Of course, I’m just a moron with a computer. What do I know. I should look to the professional sports writer for an answer. And by all means, I should never, ever publish my own thoughts.
So, I look toward an 87-year old high school dropout who is a walking conflict of interest for guidance. And what does Grandpa Sports tell me? Well, he tells me that the owner of the team, Glen Taylor, says that the problem is “Team Chemistry”. Taylor is the guy that hired McHale. While McHale made one boneheaded move after another, Taylor defended McHale and has said repeatedly that McHale has his job for as long as he wants it. See, there comes a point in time, in my opinion, where a boss becomes responsible for a subordinate’s incompetence. That point in time occurred for Taylor vis-à-vis McHale a long bertin’ time ago. When Taylor says that “he doesn't believe that personnel is the problem. Rather, it's a lack of chemistry and the inability to play as a unit that has led to a number of defeats” I just shake my head. Taylor's been having a little PR problem lately, but never fear. Sid'll write a column to defend him. All Taylor's probably gotta do is buy Sid a silver butter knife steak or something.
I’m a huge NBA fan and I love KG, but I’m not even watching games anymore and I wouldn’t even think about actually buying a ticket to a game to watch that collective group of misfits squander one game after another and in the larger sense the prime of a Hall of Famer’s career. I’m the customer and in other industries, the customer is always right. I’ve watched basketball forever and I think it’s that the team is almost devoid of talent. Most everyone else says that the team is devoid of talent. But, the 87-year old high school dropout, who should just get his nose tattooed brown and get it over with, tells me through the owner of the team the problem isn’t with the front office. No. The problem is the players. Not that they aren’t talented, but that there are chemistry issues. And the 87-year old high school dropout, who mentored Patrick Reusse when he was a young man, prints it as if it were the truth. Yep. There’s no room for anyone else to write what they think. Leave it to the experts.
Reusse justifies his opinion by pointing out that some bloggers aren’t very good and hell, anyone can have a blog. So what? The people vote about these things. Blogs that aren’t very good don’t get read. And when columnists just kiss ass for access until their lips are chapped, more and more people are saying “No thanks”. Reusse writes that the word "BLOG" is "an acronym for boot licking, obfuscation and grandiosity." If that doesn't describe Hartman's column, then I'm Reusse's uncle.
But, hey, it’s not like people aren’t reading Sid Hartman’s column. People are reading it to death. But, increasingly other competition chips away. Sid’ll never change – he’s gonna be Sid until he dies (or all his readers do, whatever comes first -- and it's not an easy bet right now). And Top Jimmy, who was once, in my opinion, a helluva beat writer, is going to write absolutely painful columns with stupid one-liners that fret about whether the Twins will be able to retain Torii Hunter long after he ceased being even their fourth priority. But people like Reusse are going to have to face what so many Americans have faced in other industries: adapt or die.
Reusse’s diatribe reminds me of Dave Letterman’s relentless attack on cable television about 20 or so years ago. Letterman, whom I loved in college – his show started when I was a senior in high school – kept making fun of cable TV. I loved Dave but man, was he off base. Cable was the future. Anyone could see that. I love Dave, but I watch Colbert Report. On cable. Sorry Dave. You were the man.
Anyway, back to the Strib. They’ve offered their readers more access through their bloggers. They’ve made their beat writers accessible to the public. They are providing more and better coverage. I think it's gonna be great. (And hell, I might even be willing to gulp! pay for some of that type of content.) And Reusse doesn’t like it. So, he takes it out on a bunch of people who are so passionate about the Twins that they spend countless hours writing about the team and expressing their thoughts for little or no compensation whatsoever. They argue about the team, its players and its managers. They buy tickets to games, they watch the games on TV – they are the team’s most loyal customers. Reusse compares them to a bunch of bums. Yes, he says that the Bum is gonna have a blog in the Strib, but come on. Is he saying that the beat writers at the Strib are akin to a homeless bum?
Well, Reusse’s written some pretty funny stuff. I think he’s got a sense of humor so maybe he’ll appreciate that I finally got some use out of that Sunday newspaper. I don’t really live down at the incinerator. I have a residence and we have cats. My wife is pregnant, so I have the job of cleaning the litter boxes. And tonight’s my night to do that. But, I gotta do something with the spent litter.



I tried to read Reusse's article.
Do anti-bloggers not realize the diversity of blogging? Looking at the biggest Twins sites, there's
a) Fan sites, like Batgirl.
b) Deep analysis sites, like Gleeman (who was so good at it that he's now writing for a national publication (online only)).
c) Clearinghouse sites, like Seth, that link to nearly everything they find about the organization.
d) Original reporting sites, also like Seth, who actually interviews players.
e) Half-baked crap, like SBG, that does analysis, humor, and fan stuff.
f) Raw crap sites, like the (now, pretty much dead) AMR's, that can be mild (mine) to incindiary.
The more bloggers there are, the more that people can avoid the raw crap sites and get to the quality, in whatever flavor they like. I mean, if they weren't that good, Seth, Gleeman, and Batgirl still wouldn't be the top three, and they probably would have gone the way of a lot of other sites I once put in my favorites.
I've got a feeling that the other teams out there may have different types of blogs, but I bet a lot come down into a bunch of those categories. I can imagine a bunch more raw crap for the TWolves and Vikings right now, some of it probably quite mean.
If Reusse's come across a lot of Raw Crap sites, then maybe that's what's his problem is. If anyone ever gets a chance, they should ask Reusse if he's ever read Gleeman or Seth.
I find the actual reporting that newspapers, MLB.com, ESPN, and the AP do to be very useful and non-replaceable. A lot of columns are a lot more replaceable by people willing to do that for free, with better (or just fewer) jokes.
I just re-read the Reusse column for the first time. What a piece of crap. Definitely takes my opinion of the man down many notches. How awful is it that people put their water-cooler conversations on the internet?
When you list the top three, I'm assuming that you've categorized this site as the WGOM.
(Don't forget how good the Twins Geek was, too.)
I still read the newspaper on the net. I appreciate the value of having access. I also appreciate the value of not having access. The Twins blogging community is really very good. Reusse's stinker of a column is really pitiful.
I'm not sure how big SBG(TWGOM) is. I love it, but it seems it may be a bit less universal than the other three I mentioned. Maybe by seeing the same 15 people in the comments over and over, I underestimate non-citizen readership?
I wasn't exactly sure about my rankings. I really just wanted to be illustrative. TwinsGeek is now blogging in print during the season via gameday, and I'd've grouped him into a deep analysis with Gleeman. I know Nick and Nick do a lot of great writing, too, but I left them out because I'm not a regular reader.
Comment registration here, I think, might make the readership vs. comments relationship a bit skewed compared to other blogs.
That said, I wouldn't really want to rank Twins blogs. Like you pointed out, they are pretty diverse, and different people enjoy different styles of baseball coverage. I think we're pretty lucky to have so many top-flight blogs, though.
This is true. There are some pretty sites out there, which is really why Reusse's column is so far off the mark.
My readership is definitely less universal than those three. No question about it. Having said that, I think that the readership is a lot bigger than who actually comments based on what the counter says. Even if it isn't, it's still a lot of fun.
Pat's just hearing the footsteps behind him. Blogs are a newspaperman's "outsourcing" scare. I feel for him. Adapt or die, dude.
We get the St. Louis Post-Dispatch here; there are very few items of interest that I look over in the print version, but the clipped coupons pay for the subscription.
bottle couzie. I'm offended. Unless you were drinking BudMilloors crap. In which case, go for it.
Your body is a Temple, SBG. Put good beer in a proper vessel and drink with thanks to the Gods. John Barleycorn is dead.
Do I get any credit for it being a Minnesota Twins couzie?
I got me a Viqueen couzie. I keep it on the shelf next to my Wellstone button and my Rudy's Super Duper Milk House souvenir plastic cup, circa 1986.
Bravo SBG. This is one of my favorite articles you've ever written. You might like Reusse, and he's a fine writer, but I've pretty much always found him to be a pretentious and condescending asshole.
This is so bad that the guys at FJM had to write about it.
Man, I couldn't read half of Reusse's rant. I'd really like to think his vitriol is motivated out of bad experiences with replacement-level blogs. My guess is that it is more likely he's ignorant of the quality work being done in the various genres of blogs out there, or that he automatically equates "blog" with the blurbs you find written on MySpace.
Either is extremely unfortunate, but I can't say I'm surprised. Newspaper sportswriters, particularly of the older generation, have resisted non-Triple Crown statistics for years. Taking a cheap shot at a subject at best poorly understood really isn't a new tactic for them, but it is a bit refreshing to sense the fear in the anti-blog ranting of old-timey journalists, not just their usual combination of conceit and patronization.
Done and done. The local rags are but a waste of trees...
For nearly twenty years, a copy of the the Trib and a couple of French roasts were how my day began. I had a routine--start with sports (Reusse, then boxscores--Barerro if his venom was directed at a worthy subject and not his usual misanthropy) then move to Variety. By the second cup I was off into the local section and finally, the front page--the editorials and cartoons being the end point. (A Tom Toles 'toon always left me with a smile til mid-morning.) After that, I was ready to face the the world. Eventually, as the quality of the writing slipped/caved-in over the years, I let my subscription go dormant. I still picked up the occasional copy--Thursday for the Food section, and Friday for the Entertainment and events calendar. Still, my day felt incomplete without washing the newsprint from my hands each morning, so I started buying the St. Paul daily. Chris Hewitt, Jim Walsh and Brian Lambert were all superior to their sister city's equivalents. (Their sports writers were another story--Is there a bigger hack than Tom Powers?) I put up with their conservative slant mainly because all I wanted were some boxscores and a bit of pop culture with my morning cuppa. I could get my news from the NY Times online and my delivered Newyorker. AND, I was saving two bits a day. Then the Pi-Press started publishing their papers before 10 PM (eastern time) rendering all box scores moot. My business with the local dailies was officially complete.
As my internet surfing grew more savvy, ESPN became my source for boxscores--and Bill Simmons(Top Jimmy tries so hard to match wits with the Sports Guy. And fails...) I found more sites that met my sports needs. For baseball; SBG: for coverage with a tad more schooling and verve than Grandpa Sports could ever manage. Batgirl: for that unbridled enthusiasm that I, a cynical 40-somthing artist don't normally travel in--but will here admit to reveling in. And finally, Gleeman: for his insight and writing skills--really quite prodigious for a man of his age--at least when he's not dwelling on who his pin-up girl should be (here's a vote for Helen Miren, young man)or his bout with cauliflower ear. For my hoop jones (and basketball is the only sport that could rival my love for baseball), Henry Abbott's truehoop.com is tops.
For pop culture, calls and e-mails from/to my friends Jill and Andy are really all I need... But I digress.
(Funny--my initial post was to say I think it's great that SBG was imbibing a bit before his post--I've never posted before an adult beverage gave me the courage of my convictions. For the record I'm polishing off an amusing Pinot Noir after a brutal 5 day stretch in the hospitalty world.
(Then again, maybe it's just the comments section that the Grump from Fulda has issues with. I didn't read the article, either...)
I can't even bring myself to read Reusse's poor excuse for a column. I am flat out impressed with anyone who has the patience (is that the right word??) to read shit like that.
I'm not involved in the newspaper business but don't they have editors? How can Reusse collect a paycheck for basically just mailing it in? I'm guessing he'd get an F at any decent journalism school in the country for that piece of crap.
I’m guessing he’d get an F at any decent journalism school in the country for that piece of [half-baked] crap.
Algonad's right. Good editing is essential.