Mike Lamb, your newest Minnesota Twin. Lamb is will be 32 years old on Aug. 9, 2008. He was drafted out of high school (but not signed) by the Twins in 1996.
Lamb played four seasons for the Rangers and then the last for seasons for Houston. He had three pretty good seasons hitting for the Astros (119, 113, and 112 OPS+) and one clunker (89 OPS+ in 2005). He's got some punch, averaging a homerun every 26.3 ABs as an Astro (then again, that is the home of the popup home run). Well, it is for right handers -- Lamb is a lefty. So, that's an encouraging number of home runs (but do we need more lefties?). It turns out that Lamb's platoon split is fairly small. In his career, he's hit .284/.340/.430 against right handed pitching and .268/.336/.411 against left handed pitching. He's hit quite a bit better at home as opposed to on the road in his career and that would make sense as both Texas and Houston are hitters' parks. His road line looks like this: .269/.329/.399. Not too great. He's been better during his Houston years at home vs. on the road, but the numbers are a little better than what you see here, as he was a lot better hitter during his Houston years overall.
Defensively, he never played more than about 50 games at third base in any one season at 3B and his range numbers are not particularly great, but not uniform, either. SSS? We'll see.
Not a bad signing, I don't think. ubelmann, feel free to chime in with your own post.
<ubelmann>I don't really have a whole post on Lamb at the moment, I think. My initial reaction is that Lamb won't be very good, but it's a small enough commitment (~$3M/year for 2 years), that it's not really a big deal. With Tejada off the market, and no talks with the Dodgers (LaRoche) in progress, I didn't really see a way for the Twins to make a huge splash at 3B this year. They're probably not going to be competitive anyway, so just doing something that's a small upgrade but doesn't hamper the team's future is fine with me.
We got a stopgap who isn't very good, but is probably somewhat better than the alternatives. ZiPS has:
.214/.263/.305 -- Moses
.235/.311/.306 -- Punto
.231/.302/.359 -- Macri
.255/.306/.363 -- Tolbert
.268/.330/.409 -- Harris
.273/.344/.433 -- Lamb
.268/.332/.436 -- Kubel
(I threw Kubel and Moses in there for fun.)
Lamb's numbers will get knocked down a bit moving from Houston, so it looks like he'll be about the same hitter as Brendan Harris. You hear bad things about Lamb's defense, so that could be a problem. UZR has him as basically average at third base over the last 2-4 years, so it might not be a big deal. (Other metrics could disagree.)
In an ideal world, Lamb would take over Jeff Cirillo's role on the team, but things are not too ideal these days. Considering that everything I've seen on Harris' defense makes him a liability at every position he's played in the infield, if Lamb is even an average defender, I probably prefer him to Harris at this point.
In considering how the Twins will dole out playing time, I'm not sure. I could see Harris/Lamb mostly platooning at 3B, with Everett starting at SS, and Punto starting at 2B. Then, if the situation dictated, you could pinch hit for Everett or Punto with Harris or Monroe and shuffle everyone else accordingly. Like most moves a GM makes, this isn't either a huge loss or a huge gain for the club.</ubelmann>

So are we like the Houston Astros of Minnesota now? We should just go for the entire Astros infield. I know Loretta is on the table, and maybe a Morneau for Berkman blockbuster is being discussed as well.
Get Morgan Ensberg!
Doesn't Bagwell or Biggio fit the Batista/Ponson/White mold a little bit better?
Smitty trying to get a six-pack of Colt 45's?
I wouldn't be surprised to see something like this come April.
1. Crisp* (B) CF (.280/.329/.409)
2. Mauer (L) C (.313/.394/.459)
3. Cuddyer (R) RF (.270/.346/.450)
4. Morneau (L) 1B (.276/.340/.498)
5. Young (R) LF (.293/.319/.419)
6. Kubel (L) DH (.265/.320/.428)
7. Harris (R) 2B (.273/.331/.418)
8. Lamb (L) 3B (.281/.339/.427)
9. Everett (R) SS (.248/.299/.357)
Bench: Redman (C-.293/.349/.368), Punto (2B/SS-.245/.314/.321), Buscher (3B/1B-.244/.323/.329), Monroe (OF/DH-.256/.303/.446), Pridie (OF-.279/.326/.432 MiLB career)
Rotation (ERA/WHIP): Santana (3.22/1.094), Baker (4.26/1.329), Liriano (2.74/1.016), Bonsor (4.77/1.434), Perkins/Slowey (2.88/1.107)/(4.33/1.395)
Bullpen: Nathan (closer), Neshek (setup), Guerrier (setup), Crain (setup/long relief), Reyes (loogy), Rincon (expensive groundskeeper)
*Pending non-Santana trade with Boston.
I wouldn't mind that roster. Switch out Pridie if he needs some more farm time, and Tony Clark could put Lamb on the bench and Buscher back in AAA (although there won't be much room in Rochester).
Also, maybe Young should bat third, as his low OBP would be least likely to lead off an inning there. But Cuddyer has batted between M&M before, and Young is supposed to be Hunter's replacement in the lineup, so 5th or 6th is probably what will happen.
Wait -- I think we would need an actual long reliever / "groundskeeper" in the pen. We'd have to use at least 3 or 4 of these setup guys to get through short starts, and that's just not acceptable with 2-3 "iffy" rotation spots. I hate to drop a bench player, so maybe we'll still see Rincon dealt. Or Nathan.
I guess we didn't have to deal with this much last year, after Crain's injury.
The way Gardenhire loves to bunt, can we look forward to seeing a sacrificial Lamb?
-5
+1
Hey, somebody had to say it.
uh, no, it could easily have gone without saying, thanks anyway.
I'm more interested in his leadership skills. Usually, someone else leads the lamb to slaughter.
Enos Slaughter?
Goin' back to the country.