Cup of Coffee: July 22, 2008
Posted by SBG on Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 at 6:28 am
For some reason, the Twins just can't seem to win in New York. Yep, the Yankees are a good team, but this laying down every year in the Bronx just isn't good. Bremer said that the Twins haven't won a series in New York since 2001. That's way too long for a good team to be dominated. I'm getting sick of it.


Yesterday, JoePos writes a story about Stan Musial that has serious factual inaccuracies, if it isn't totally false.
I checked baseball-reference.com and there was no game in 1952 that match this fact pattern. Further, there was no game in the years that Ben Wade pitched for the Dodgers that fit that fact pattern. Solly Hemus wasn't the Cardinals manager in 1952. The story doesn't smell right -- Musial watched guys get thrown out before he even asked what the call was? Please.
Boo.
For shame, SBG. Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
I guess the next question is did Musial ever hit a game-winning triple at any time?
Against the Dodgers at home? The at home part is problematic, too. Is a player credited with a triple in such an instance? Probably not. He most certainly wouldn't be risking making the third out at third before the winning run scores. Even so, is he actually awarded a triple in this instance? The whole thing smells like a fairy tale.
Solly Hemus was the manager from 1959-61, but by then, the Dodgers were in LA.
I would think that if the home team is down by two runs and the batter achieves third base before the base runner from first crosses the plate with the winning run, the batter would get credited with a triple. Not a likely scenario, but stranger things have happened.
I know it happened to the Twins in 2006 or 2007. Can't remember who (maybe Bart?), but I didn't watch the game and only read the recap. I was surprised that he got credited with a triple, considering the runner at first was the winning run. IIRC, he almost passed the baserunner at first (who was holding up in case the ball was caught). Silly baserunning though... you should get to second and sit down. Of course, if the baserunner was out at home, getting to third would be valuable.
Wait, no Bart had the game winning ground-rule single because the winning run was at third. No idea who did this.
Here's an example of a walk-off triple from an Astros-Cubs game last year.
If this happens, my year will be complete.
It seems the Yanquis are our El Guapo and we're trying to fight him without Ned Nederlander.
+3 Amigos
I wonder if there is anything that changed about the Twins between the 2001 and 2002 season. Maybe something that has an effect on the players' mental focus and preparation. That does seem odd, doesn't it?
Yeah, losing Matt Lawton really made a difference.
No, no, no. It was bringing Santana out of the bullpen. He just didn't have the makeup to be a starter.
Look to the helm, gentlemen. Gardy doesn't know how to win at Yankee Stadium. All that mystique and whatnot, don't you know.
Wait a second. Are you insinuating that it wasn't the loss of Matt Lawton? I recall that he was in charge of determining whether Joe Nathan could pitch three innings of relief in the playoffs.
I've updated SBG Convention II in Pictures.
I found this note today at the always entertaining Royals fansite RoyalsReview (btw stick, you should add that site to the blogroll)
The Royals lost 19-4 to the Tigers last night
TPJ has like a -20 VORP hitting, so short of allowing about 21 runs in an inning, it would be really tough for TPJ to have a worse pitching VORP than hitting VORP. I like his glove, but there's no way he's even a replacement level player the way he's been hitting. (Though if he was a pitcher, no one would complain about his hitting.)
Maybe he's the anti-Ankiel.
Mr. Nathan was a SS before moving to the mound.
Not starting in the majors.
Uniwatch with the blast from the
pastfutureputure??OMG. quality stuff, as always.
HA!
great read
Wag the dukkha?
Howard says LaVelle says that D-SPAN2 is going to be at the top of this evening's program schedule, so to belabor a metaphor.
Victory is assured.
Dang, beat me by 5 minutes. Gardy takes his time getting there, but does eventually seem to come around to common sense.
He must have read Souhan's column.
Everyone knows that Gomez is struggling. But I keep reading quotes from him that, to me, seems like he can make it in the bigs
from LaVelle today
I have a feeling its going to be a-ok in the long run
but in the short term, a move to the 9th slot is good for everyone
Gomez batting 9th today... Let's cross our fingers and hope Denard doesn't screw up and get switched back...
Whoa I was way behind. I must not have refreshed the page for like 20 minutes.
So I'm cruising around craigslist like I do from time to time... and I run across this.
Now if only I had $25K laying around, I'd have a team that I could feed Elsinore Beer to.. World domination never seemed so easy
Glad to see their logo makes it abundantly clear that they're shooting dice, not bullets or the ....breeze.
Or hockey pucks, at the goal...
That would mean that you might want to win a game, instead of betting against the team...
Good point - it's funny to see gambling imagery in a sports logo.
The Nation could pass the hat and come up with some fraction of that, no?
Moss is in for $25 if 1000 other Citizens will do the same...Moss will even agree to be a silent partner!