WGOM Radio #1
August 16th, 2008 by SBG
This is the first edition of WGOM Radio. I talk about last night's game and today's game. It's five minutes long.
Tell me what you think!
This entry was posted by SBG on Saturday, August 16th, 2008 at 10:46 am and is filed under Featured Articles, Miscellaneous. It is one of 2465 entries by the author. We are no longer accepting Letters to the Editor on this post.







Beau replied on August 16, 2008 at 11:47:03 am
Were you reading from a script ot just doing this extemperaneously?
Very informative (love the mention of Silva only missing two bats), and your enunciation is excellent, but it's pretty monotone and the sentences don't flow smoothly. I'd listen again, though.
E-6 replied on August 16, 2008 at 12:36:32 pm
I agree with Beau on all his points. Good content, but a bit wooden in it's presentation. (They don't call him Stick for nothing!) Maybe some soft white noise running in the background would soften it up. Like newsroom sounds--keyboards being tapped and such--or maybe the sound of a fun little party or bar with glasses clinking and soft laughter. Or, better yet, both newsroom and party. It is the WGOM, after all. (There's gotta be mp3s of that stuff runnin' all through the intratubes.)
And maybe a call letter jingle. Nothing fancy. Just some blended voices singing," W-G-O-M! Haaaaaalf------baked..." (I know there's a citizen out there with the talents to make that happen. The desire is prolly another matter.)
brianS replied on August 20, 2008 at 1:52:19 am
mebbe get Baby SBG to belt out the call letters or summat?
E-6 replied on August 20, 2008 at 9:58:20 am
I likey.
SBG replied on August 20, 2008 at 10:00:13 am
It'll be a while.
Banjo replied on August 16, 2008 at 12:40:48 pm
Overall pretty good --content wise, the basic recap info (like you might find in the box score) seems redundant, while your personal insight, such as "missed two bats" is more interesting. You can tell your delivery is more relaxed and conversational when it's commentary, and more "newscastery" when you are reporting. I'd say because most of your audience will have seen the game, read the boxscore or seen highlights on the world wider leader, the Andy Rooney stuff will be more entertaining and informative.
From a delivery standpoint, I'd say if you could emulate the tone, pacing and delivery you might have if you were in a bar having a beer with one of the citizens, you'd relax and it would sound better. (Not that it sounded bad this time). If you listen to Aaron Gleeman's short videos or his segments on KFAN he's actually pretty good -- he's relaxed, talks in his normal voice and his delivery is like he's having a conversation. If you wanted to emulate a regular guy, I think he does a good job.
Here's a link to some inexpensive theme music. I used Suzie when I was doing a weekly five minute segment for one of my clients. I thought it raised the production values quit a bit.
Aaron Gleeman replied on August 16, 2008 at 1:25:43 pm
I'm going to print this paragraph out and frame it! Wow!
I thought it was pretty good, albeit a little stilted (but not necessarily nervous-sounding, which I think is slightly different). But that's expected for a first try, obviously.
SBG: What did you use to record/edit? I've been thinking about doing either some video stuff or some audio stuff for a while now and have been toying with Audacity for creating MP3s. Was wondering if you used that or something else.
SBG replied on August 16, 2008 at 3:04:17 pm
I have a microphone for my computer and I used Audacity. Works pretty good for a free product.
Banjo replied on August 16, 2008 at 12:44:57 pm
Mod Pod Music
SBG replied on August 16, 2008 at 1:05:19 pm
I did do it extemporaneously. If I would have had a script, it would have been a lot easier. I wanted it to be five minutes -- the original cut was 9 minutes but I edited stuff out to get it down to five minutes. The eventual goal is to be able to sit down at the computer, pump out five minutes worth in the morning and put it up. I'm not used to talking in a microphone, so it was a little stilted.
Aaron Gleeman replied on August 16, 2008 at 1:28:02 pm
BTW, in my long-standing tradition of copy/expanding upon content ideas found at the WGOM, this has motivated me to actually record some stuff, rather than just plan to record some stuff.
Rhubarb_Runner replied on August 16, 2008 at 3:36:26 pm
Nice to see you taking half-baked ideas and cooking them to completion!
I'm guess I'm old-fashioned; I prefer to read my content in a browser. /old-guy channelling
brianS replied on August 16, 2008 at 4:24:07 pm
as long as you keep the rubes in your comments section away from here, we're all in favor of the theft, AG
Banjo replied on August 16, 2008 at 6:54:33 pm
It was good--- especially for a first crack --and what you're describing is no easy task. I did about 30 podcasts for my client which were all right around 3 minutes in length. You hit the nail on the head though. They key is being a ruthless editor. I had the same set up - Audacity exported as MP3s. Very powerful program. If you want, you can make yourself sound like James Earl Jones/
New Britain Bo replied on August 16, 2008 at 4:47:51 pm
Stick - nice first outing!
You need some walking music (the music that Doc Severinsen & Co. played while the guest walked over to the couch), and a trademarked parting shot.
Looking forward to more.
Dread Pirate Will Young replied on August 16, 2008 at 6:28:04 pm
My two favorite moments:
1) you began a sentence with "Nevertheless". Let's hear Gleeman do that on KFAN!
2) about halfway through, you mentioned Liriano pitching "at the major league level"
SBG replied on August 17, 2008 at 7:18:17 am
Yeah, I cringed when I heard that (at the major league level) in the edit. I should have dubbed something else in there.
CarterHayes replied on August 17, 2008 at 12:35:24 am
I'll echo all those who have said it was a good first run. As you settle into a format the delivery will flow better, but there's no nervousness there or anything like that.
I don't know how many of the out-of-market citizens have access to watching most games, so I can only speak for myself when it comes to recaps, and I've gotta say I'd really rather hear your commentary than a summary of the box score. If there are pertinent pieces of information, that's all good, but I'd really rather get the goods on the turning points of the game or other items of interest from your perspective. Maybe other people who don't have an MLB media package will feel differently, but I feel like I can get a recap plenty of other places and I'd rather devote the entire time to your observations.
One final thought, which some have already mentioned: music and/or intro. Doesn't have to be elaborate or anything - the NBC chimes are as iconic and simple as anything in media. No need to go all drive-time radio with anything to inject some WGOM-brand flavor into the mini-podcast, but it might be worth having a little intro/outro tune to make the final product feel a bit more polished.
Overall, a really good first effort. I'll definitely tune into WGOM Radio again.
SBG replied on August 17, 2008 at 7:25:22 am
I have a couple of tunes in mind
for bumper music.
This was really an experiment -- all I know is that I wanted 5 minutes, tops. Nothing worse than a really long and rambling piece. The notes I jotted down were basically this: intro, Carlos Silva bad, Liriano good. I opened a few tabs on Firefox for some background facts and let it go.
My impressions watching the game were this: Silva was really having trouble finding the strike zone, but when he did the Twins were absolutely pounding him. Baseball-reference backed that up. Plus, with Liriano, he looked good, but he seemed to be trying to be too nasty. A fair number of sliders in the dirt, especially in that fourth inning.
I have been interviewed on the radio and for podcasts multiple times, but there's a big difference between answering questions being thrown you way and trying to pound out five minutes of non-rambling material.
Dread Pirate Will Young replied on August 17, 2008 at 10:56:45 am
Once you get the hang of it, you should start incorporating in-studio guests. I would be willing to bet a lot of money that there isn't one WGOM citizen who could sound worse than Reusse.
Banjo replied on August 17, 2008 at 11:17:10 am
You can do this using Skype and Audacity..
CarterHayes replied on August 17, 2008 at 2:11:15 pm
Cool idea. Regular chinwags with citizens would be a pretty cool addition.
Moss replied on August 17, 2008 at 9:29:18 pm
Hey Stick, don't listen to those critics...you were no worse than Herb Carneal. Of course, he's been dead awhile. (Insert rimshot here.)
Good effort. Moss would actually be more likely to listen to a 3-minute take than a 5-minute version, though.
Moss likes the typewriter or barroom background-noise ideas, and the "WGOM" call sign idea too.