<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monte Montgomery &#8212; Little Wing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stickandballguy.com/blog/2008/10/01/monte-montgomery-little-wing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stickandballguy.com/blog/2008/10/01/monte-montgomery-little-wing/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Source for Half-Baked Crap</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: twayn</title>
		<link>http://stickandballguy.com/blog/2008/10/01/monte-montgomery-little-wing/#comment-167522</link>
		<dc:creator>twayn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stickandballguy.com/blog/?p=7924#comment-167522</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s obviously a very talented guitar player, but &lt;em&gt;Little Wing&lt;/em&gt; just is not an acoustic number in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He's obviously a very talented guitar player, but <em>Little Wing</em> just is not an acoustic number in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-6</title>
		<link>http://stickandballguy.com/blog/2008/10/01/monte-montgomery-little-wing/#comment-167516</link>
		<dc:creator>E-6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stickandballguy.com/blog/?p=7924#comment-167516</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;And apparently a lot of people like his work.&lt;/em&gt;

I guess I&#039;m just not one of them. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>And apparently a lot of people like his work.</em></p>
<p>I guess I'm just not one of them. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianS</title>
		<link>http://stickandballguy.com/blog/2008/10/01/monte-montgomery-little-wing/#comment-167441</link>
		<dc:creator>brianS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stickandballguy.com/blog/?p=7924#comment-167441</guid>
		<description>so, you&#039;re saying you didn&#039;t like this one?

different strokes. I enjoyed it. And apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Montgomery&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a lot of people&lt;/a&gt; like his work.

Plus, he looks like one of my former graduate students (a nice Nord duhcoatuh boy). So he&#039;s got that going for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, you're saying you didn't like this one?</p>
<p>different strokes. I enjoyed it. And apparently <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Montgomery" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">a lot of people</a> like his work.</p>
<p>Plus, he looks like one of my former graduate students (a nice Nord duhcoatuh boy). So he's got that going for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-6</title>
		<link>http://stickandballguy.com/blog/2008/10/01/monte-montgomery-little-wing/#comment-167393</link>
		<dc:creator>E-6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stickandballguy.com/blog/?p=7924#comment-167393</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a losing proposition trying to cover Hendrix. Stevie Ray and Clapton have done nice interpretations, but they can&#039;t top the originals. No one will. And certainly not this guy. To take a signature Jimi piece and stretch it to over 3 times it&#039;s original length involves some serious hubris. Sorry, Monte, I&#039;m not impressed. Jimi had more flair in his right pinkie than you have in your entire, misshapen body.

&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;344&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/hfPgj4bviKY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/hfPgj4bviKY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;344&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;
(For those of you curious where the pic wattsy uses originated--Jimi at Monterey, 1967.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a losing proposition trying to cover Hendrix. Stevie Ray and Clapton have done nice interpretations, but they can't top the originals. No one will. And certainly not this guy. To take a signature Jimi piece and stretch it to over 3 times it's original length involves some serious hubris. Sorry, Monte, I'm not impressed. Jimi had more flair in his right pinkie than you have in your entire, misshapen body.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hfPgj4bviKY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hfPgj4bviKY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
(For those of you curious where the pic wattsy uses originated--Jimi at Monterey, 1967.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
