Game 2: Mariners @ Twins

Erik Bedard (09’ projected stats from PECOTA: 3.67 ERA/3.89 DERA/1.34 WHIP/117 IP)

Vs.

Nick Blackburn (09’ projects stats from PECOTA: 5.22ERA/5.32DERA/1.50WHIP/113.3 IP)

Simulations on these two pitchers vary wildly from Blackburn’s Bill James projection of 196 innings of 4.18 ERA ball to his PECOTA rates seen above. The same can be said of Bedard as well with Bill James also being especially bullish concerning Bedard’s durability expecting 180 innings from the often injured lefty. Will either of these pitchers live up to the hype of Bill James or come crashing back down to earth in the way the PECOTA suggests? The truth is that they will probably fall somewhere in the middle.

Nick Blackburn was ranked the #1 prospect in the Twins organization by Baseball America heading into the 2008 season. Many were surprised by the ranking as most pundits felt that Blackburn wouldn’t even be the best rookie starting on the team in the upcoming season. Blackburn caught Twins fans off guard by pitching well in his first season as a starter with the Twins debuting with a 4.40 FIP in 193.3 innings. Blackburn was able to do this while, in most categories, not showing any drastic changes from his minor league track record.

Minor League Avgs/ 2008

K/BB: 2.82/2.46

BB/9: 2.00/1.82

WHIP: 1.20/1.36

HR/9: 0.60/1.07

K/9: 5.6/4.5

A 2.46 K/BB rate isn’t going to light the world on fire, without a doubt, but it isn’t terrible for a rookie pitcher. The starter who Blackburn often times seem to draw comparisons to, Bob Tewksbury, didn’t reach this total until his second season. As for his BB/9, you really can’t complain when a rookie pitcher posts a better BB/9 rate in the majors than he did in the minors. Concerning his WHIP, chalk up the increase in talent level Blackburn was facing. The major concern of mine is Blackburn nearly doubled the amount of home runs he allowed per nine innings versus his minor league career totals. As for his K/9 rate, while not fantastic, I don’t believe that it is low enough to be a concern just yet.

So the question now becomes, can he sustain the success he had last season (100 ERA+) this season? Or, more to the point, can Nick Blackburn improve upon his rookie season where he was essentially a league average pitcher?

The first step that he could take, in the words of Bert, is to “keep the ball down." The information relating to Blackburn’s GB/FB rate in the minors is not available online but I think it fair to say that he fared better than he did in the majors in allowing ground balls 44.9% of the time. When Blackburn is striking out 11.66% of the batters he faces while allowing that percentage of ground balls he looks suspiciously like Jeff Suppan (11.54% K /BF, 44.4 GB %) or Scott Feldman (11.37K/BF, 43.54% GB). The most troubling statistic for Blackburn, which surely will regress to the mean this season, was his “ability” to stand runners at the rate of 70.7%.

After taking a look at those numbers, I can see why projection systems like PECOTA might be a little harsh on the 2nd year pro. Limiting him to 113 innings though; that I just don’t see.

As for Erik Bedard, I am sure that his story doesn’t need to be told to anyone. After coming over from Baltimore last off-season in exchange for a number of players equivalent to the population in Antarctica, Bedard suffered from shoulder problems which put him on the shelf in early July. When healthy, Bedard has some nasty stuff that rivals any starting lefty in the bigs (outside of Santana, naturally). While it is doubtful that he will return to his 2007 form this season (221K’s, 3.16 ERA, 1.09 WHIP) he is sure to improve over a lack luster 2008 where he only started 8 games.

Enough with the numbers-- a MUST WIN for the Twins tonight if we hope to stay in the hunt for the divisional crown!

222 LTEs in response to Game 2: Mariners @ Twins