Have a new cup.
|
|||||
Cup of Coffee: June 2, 2009Have a new cup. This entry was posted by SBG
on Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009 at 7:37 am and is filed under Cup of Coffee. It is one of 3096 entries by the author.
We are no longer accepting Letters to the Editor on this post.
35 comments to Cup of Coffee: June 2, 2009 |
Cup of CoffeeWolves lose again by 22, Kevin Love down to 17 minutes. This is the worst possible situation for the Wolves. They are driving what is left of their fan base with a tremendous stretch of terrible basketball. Their best, or second-best, player has checked out and is getting buried on the bench. I doubt that Love is in their long term plans. How's that O.J. Mayo deal looking now? Citizens Online19 Users Online WGOM Sign InLog InRetired WGOM Jokes
WGOM Achievements
Race to the Bottom: Highest Loss Totals in T-Wolves History67: 1991-92 Recent Letters to the EditorIn Response to Cup of Coffee: March 18, 2010, Milt on Tilt wrote: I'm picking up my puppy tomorrow. I couldn't be more excited. spookymilk wrote: Oh, and Rhu: one of my challenges in this week's Survivor game was to do a six-word evaluation of Lew Zealand. These were the … flinger never flounders for puns. Better than Belladonna with fish… spookymilk wrote: Ah. Well, I'd be in favor of both, if the technology isn't a killer to the site somehow. Rhubarb_Runner wrote: That map was hometowns, not current places of residence. Although that map might be nice, too. St. Louis checking in. Hey Kla, what part of LA? spookymilk wrote: This thread reminds me, Stick: isn't there a WGOM map somewhere? It seems like it existed when I was lurking, but in the couple-month period before I started posting, it disappeared. Was that… hungry joe wrote: chi-town, checking in. however, i do get 9 games a year at the resplendent u.s. cellular field! hungry joe wrote: i had them going to the four. i have no idea why... spookymilk wrote: I'm one of three regulars who lives in Washington state, so there's a start. Klawitter wrote: My plan to contribute more often (than 2-3 time a year) is proceeding smashingly -- to the point where I have cracked the Top 50 LTE writers for 2010. Now that I am up… spookymilk wrote: Well, there's your 'teen, SBG: Murray St. over Vanderbilt. In Response to Nightmares at WGOMville, hungry joe wrote: i wasn't planning on going out, but two heavies from my company were in town, and they took me out for a crazy night (got home at 2, and i've been hating life most of… spookymilk wrote: I instantly love the person who took that photo, hungry man. I'm sitting here drinking Bass; yesterday I went the nostalgia route with my St. Pat's choice, opting for a drink that reminded me of college… Milt on Tilt wrote: hehe. Beer. spookymilk wrote: To be fair, drama is kind of the world I live in. I'm prone to exaggeration. Plus, I'm drunk because this script is making me tense and I needed to take the edge… Milt on Tilt wrote: Yeah, man. I wouldn't "disregard" it either, because it was truly a horrifying move. Oh come now. That's just being completely over dramatic. Milt on Tilt wrote: O-Cab lead the majors in Outs as a batter in 2009. Call me … Jimmy Rollins actually did. But Cabrera was second, and first in the AL. Even so. I could use that same… nibbish wrote: I don't know what to make of it. On one hand, Cabrera was made of suck. On the other, any shortstop we put in there was going to. I'd have to side with DK and… spookymilk wrote: Yeah, man. I wouldn't "disregard" it either, because it was truly a horrifying move. 0-Cab cleared the bases for the team's best hitter over and over. I know it's nice to remember… DK wrote: O-Cab was a baseball band-aid over a severed limb. Acting like doing that was a "victory" is what seems foolish to me. In Response to Luna - 23 Minutes In Brussels (Tell Me Do You Miss Me), E-6 wrote: Love me some Luna. In Response to Cup of Coffee: March 17, 2010, brianS wrote: I dunno. But we're not really talking about a legal argument so much as an ethical one, I think. Moss wrote: The old "you can't have your coke and snort it too" … can't get a conviction on a … test...and is possession of any amount of coke a felony?? hungry joe wrote: tell me about it... brianS wrote: It is hard to consume if you do not possess. Popular Recent Posts
WGOM Twitter
Posting tweet... |
||||
|
Copyright © 2004-2010 The WGOM - All Rights Reserved There have been visitors to the WGOM since August 23, 2004 Powered by WordPress & the Atahualpa Theme by BytesForAll. Discuss on our WP Forum 143 queries. 8.565 seconds. |
|||||

It's Jack O'Connor Day!
Jack O'Connor (1869)
Bob Lillis (1930)
Larry Jackson (1931)
Jerry Lumpe (1933)
Gene Michael (1938)
Jim Maloney (1940)
Horace Clarke (1940)
Jack O'Connor (1958)
Darnell Coles (1962)
Mike Stanton (1967)
Raul Ibanez (1972)
Neifi Perez (1973)
Oh, Jack.
did anyone watch the new Conan O'Brien last night?
Question: So last year we saw Delmon introduced with former Twin greats Killer, Carew, Oliva, and Hrbek. I want to know when this year's version of the commercial happens where Delmon is annointed with his truly similar ex-Twins Mickey Hatcher, Jason Tyner, John Moses, and Chad Allen. They tell him things like "hit below leage average at a corner outfield position and don't play great defense either" and "walks and power are overated, empty batting average is the way to go"
Heh. "Eat a big steak at Applebee's."
"See the ball, swing at the ball."
aw, heck, I guess "see the ball" isn't even required.
Dwight Howard, talking stupid about his future. The fans will determine his fate? Hoo boy.
When will multi-million dollar sports stars learn that "gotta take care of my family" no longer has any sort of real meaning to, well, pretty much everyone else?
A Strib blog post today with a comment section worth reading (and I mean that in a good way)
Wow. I can't get over the fact that FIRE VAVRA AND GARDY!!!!! was in high school in 1985. That completely explodes my mental impression of what someone with such a moniker might look like.
I HAVE LIKE THE TWINS FOR OVER 200 YEARS NOW I STARTED WATCHING IN 1987 WHEN THEY KNEW HOW TO WIN AND NOW I ONLY WATCH TO LAUGH AT HOW BAD THEY ARE! TRADE M&M TO BOSTON FOR JOSH HAMILTON HE HAD 150 RBIS LAST YEAR GET IT DONE BILLY SMITH!
1987 only seems like 200 years ago.
I didnt realize Peter Falk was not doing so well

He's going to pinch my cheeks. I HATE when he does that.
Serpentine, Peter, serpentine!
I was watching either a cartoon or a movie a few months back, and this program totally ripped off that sequence. I wish I could remember what I was watching
Generation Kill had a scene where the reporter does the serpentine run and then tries to explain to the grunts what he was doing. Good humor.
I actually think what I am remember is a scene from the new Star Trek movie. Because I remember giggling at it and my brother didnt know what was so funny
It's from the trailer of the Will Ferrell movie with dinosaurs. He's getting chased by a T-Rex.
thats it! I saw the trailer at the Star Trek movie
Slate.com has a nice article about the decline and fall of the Baseball Card Empire
That article is just about right. Still, for those of us whose cards were not an investment, but a treasure hunt, the hobby is still alive. There is a nice little community of collectors that will work out a nice trade online (of just send you cards sight-unseen and hope for something corresponding in return) that has pulled me back into collecting again after a few half-hearted years. I've made three trades in the last month or so, and just picked up a $30 '61 Drysdale for $12 to surprise a guy that I need to send some cards back to. Still, I thank God that the Baseball Card Bubble is finally collapsing back down towards reasonable levels again.
I was a huge card collector when I was a kid. But the hobby got too expensive, and the other kids in the neighborhood last interest fast, at about the same time. So when I moved away to college, I ended up throwing thousands of cards away. I save a large shoebox full of my favorite cards (17 Nolan Ryans! Rickey Henderson! Chuck Knoblauch and Kirby! Ken Griffey Jr!)
I thought about getting back in, but there are so many sets nowadays I dont know where to start. And I dont have any money
About the late 80's I decided there were too many cards, so I began only collecting Twins. I traded away much of my non-Twins cards, but still have some I hope to leverage for other Twins stuff. Have to admit I've met some neat people while collecting, which makes it enjoyable, even on a mostly passive basis.
Nice. I have a few binders of worthless cards, and a few decent ones in glass-protected cases: Kirby's rookie card; a 1990 Kirby card he signed; and an Emmitt Smith rookie card. I remember paying $20 for Emmitt's rookie card and thought I had a steal (it was worth $15 at the time and I figured it would only skyrocket).
Now I figure in sixty years they may be worth something
I hope getting debacled off the set of ESPN doesn't affect that card's value.
That should further enhance its value.
Does anyone understand why the ASA doesn't just publish their softball rules online? From their FAQ, they say:
It seems pretty strange to keep the rules under such tight control. The only thing I can think of off the top of my head is that they don't want some pointy-headed guy like me arguing with umpires over the details in the rules.
Anyway, does anyone know whether or not you're allowed to switch sides of the plate during the middle of a PA in softball (slowpitch specifically, but I'd be interested to know the fastpitch rule, too)?
It was my understanding that in baseball, you aren't allowed to switch sides after you've started a PA from one batter's box. The only thing I can find right away, though, is that you're not allowed to switch while the pitcher is in a pitching position, from 6.06b:
It's not really something I'm terribly worried about being enforced in slowpitch, but there's some disagreement amongst my teammates about whether or not that's allowed and I hate not knowing what it is supposed to be.
can a baseball pitcher switch arms or batter switch boxes within a PA? this article says yes, once anyway. It's the Venditte Rule.
With the switch-hitting and switch-pitching, I believe all of that posturing happens before a pitch is thrown. From the NYT article:
This quotation makes it sound as though each is able to make one switch before the PA starts. ("...and then it's play ball" implying that ball was not played before that point.) It is still my understanding that after the first pitch, you would not be allowed to switch sides.
The reason I have always heard is that if you go up to bunt left-handed--even though you are naturally a right-handed hitter--and then get two strikes against you, you shouldn't be allowed to go back to hitting righty because you already got the advantages being associated with hitting lefty, so you should have to deal with the downside of hitting as a lefty, too.
(In terms of the switch-switch dilemma, does that rule really work in practice? It seems like the batter and pitcher would each try to delay as long as possible to establish their initial preference because knowing the other player's initial preference dictates what their first choice would be.)
I'm a switch-hitter is softball, and although I don't know the rule, I treat it as common courtesy to pick a side and stay with it. The outfielders will think you a bit of a d!ck for making them shift around mid-AB.
That's more or less where I stand on the issue. Someone switched sides on us a few weeks ago. I was playing 3rd base at the time and someone on their bench said that it was illegal. I didn't bother pressing the issue, but it did seem like kind of a dick move.
the second link I gave was to a CBS news article from this spring, which discusses the new rule, which they called the "Venditte Rule". The pitcher establishes an arm first, then the batter a side, then each may switch ONCE during the AB (or so my recollection from their description; the actual language of the rule may differ).
After looking into this some more, I've decided that I should have trusted my first read through the rules. I don't think there is anything in the MLB rules that prevents a hitter from switching sides of the plate after two strikes (or any other time as long as it is between pitches). But hitters probably don't do it because they don't want to take a fastball in the ear.
So the Venditte "Rule" seems to restrict hitters from switching sides more than they would normally be allowed to. Though it seems that the Venditte "Rule" is more technically a set of guidelines set out by minor league umpires to deal with ambidextrous pitchers, and that MLB proper has not taken an official stand on the issue as far as I can tell.