Finally, we're able to escape that offensive juggernaut in Oakland.
|
|||||
Cup of Coffee: July 23, 2009Finally, we're able to escape that offensive juggernaut in Oakland. This entry was posted by SBG
on Thursday, July 23rd, 2009 at 6:21 am and is filed under Cup of Coffee categories and tags. It is one of 3284 entries by the author.
We are no longer accepting Letters to the Editor on this post.
106 LTEs in response to Cup of Coffee: July 23, 2009 |
Cup of CoffeeCitizens OnlineWGOM Sign InLog InRecent Letters to the EditorIn Response to Cup of Coffee: July 29, 2010, brianS wrote: I disagree. By all of the advanced stats, he's a marginal improvement at best over Rauch and Crain. The NL A-S slot is just BFD. brianS wrote: … from the Fangraphs … is a solid reliever and immediately becomes the best on the team. He’s not a great reliever, though He smells like a Twin, however. 37:9 K:BB in 45 innings this year;… davidwatts wrote: reading around the Twins blogsphere, some of the reaction is hilarious. WORST TRADE EVER has been chanted a few times. My reactions: it is what it is. We get a player, they get a player. life… vodkatang wrote: I think that's the key. Rauch and Guerrier likely won't be back. I'm think Capps as the presumptive closer next year. Who knows how Nathan progresses, he might be back, he might… Eric B. B. wrote: We're getting cash, also. Plus, I was wrong--he's got one last year of team control (arbitration) after this year. Zack wrote: We're throwing in more than Ramos? Holy god. sean wrote: Awful deal. Andrew wrote: That's crazy, seeing as how they had some stacked teams in the 90s, what with Manny, Thome, Belle among others. Eric B. B. wrote: Apparently we're throwing in LHP Joe Testa, too. This doesn't sound good. Andrew wrote: It looks like my rugby career may be over. The physio referred me to a specialist and told me "No rugby" until he says it's OK. Having had this injury before and knowing… In Response to 2010 Recaps Game 102: Twins 6, @ Royals 4, Rhubarb_Runner wrote: I'll second those comments. The fans & workers there were every bet as impressive as their scoreboard. meat wrote: Thanks for filling in for me, boss. I like the art this week. I had a few thoughts about the Royals on our long drive with nothing to think about, mostly I came to the… AMR wrote: Gordon has been up and down before. I'm thinking more in contrast to what has happening in 2004-2006 when there seemed to be a regular shuttle bus between Wichita (AA) and KC because no one on… bjhess wrote: That implies more caring then I see. Gordon sat in the minors half the year. His clock is definitely started! brianS wrote: Kids say the darndest things. AMR wrote: I don't even think the Royals fans and organization care about that team. Rany Jazayerli has been pushing the club's Minor-league talent all year. How else to explain the signings of Kendall, Ankiel,… Rhubarb_Runner wrote: Let's hear it for the art! In Response to Happy Birthday--July 29, AMR wrote: Greasy! I had forgotten about him. In Response to The Coasters- Along Came Jones, Rhubarb_Runner wrote: I've heard this one before (my dad had the 45?) but by a different group. I'll have to do some digging. FirstTimeLongTime wrote: As an artifact this is a perfect 10. In Response to Cup of Coffee: July 28, 2010, Dread Pirate Will Young wrote: Next time I'm in town. AMR wrote: Nobody believes he can walk. .012 patience! (Or whatever OBP minus AVG is). Maybe pitchers should try walking him. brianS wrote: Smoaked right by him. F-ing Mariners. brianS wrote: Jenks! You owe me a soda! In Response to Beck - Debra, Beau wrote: he also hated "Loser" if I recall |
||||
|
Copyright © 2004-2010 The WGOM - All Rights Reserved There have been visitors to the WGOM since August 23, 2004 Powered by WordPress & the Atahualpa Theme by BytesForAll. Discuss on our WP Forum 88 queries. 0.825 seconds. |
|||||

Deck Chairs on the Titanic:
Mulvey down, Crain up.
I wonder how many more AAA/AAAA starters will be drafted into the bullpen and used in totally inappropriate situations this season. I'm counting four so far: Mulvey, Duensing, Humber, Dickey (debatably).
I am guessing at least 2.
I think Mulvey was used appropriately yesterday: Long relief in a blowout. Unfortunately, his results were as bad as those of the starter he replaced and required a second long reliever.
I think the problem is that these guys are used differently in the majors than in the minors. If you are asking them to get warmed up quicker than they are used to, shouldn't they be making that transition in the minors instead of doing it at the same time they are adjusting to the majors?
I'm not sure that is a fair complaint, algonad. Who tries to develop long relievers in the minors? Nobody. It's a groundskeeper role.
if a pitcher with a marginal shot at making/staying on a major league staff wants to keep making that ML meal money, he'd better adjust himself. Otherwise he won't be in the league for long.
I'd have to imagine that part of what is going on is the organization is trying to both educate some of these kids about pitching against major-league hitters (lots of guys get hammered their first go-arounds) and evaluate their mental and physical makeups on the fly.
We are frustrated because we can see that this year's club has a real shot at the playoffs. If we were 10 games out, I rather doubt any of us would be complaining too much about the experimentation with the marginal pitching talent as BS tries to hit on 20.
Right. There were chances to upgrade the bullpen in the off season, all squandered. Even, in season, as Aaron pointed out today, there have been chances that didn't require giving up the farm.
The Twins are in the process of squandering a chance to win a division that is imminently winnable. And that pisses me off.
I'm not saying that they should make them all relievers in the minors. I just think they should have them pitch out of the bullpen for a week or two before being called up. At least give them a chance to adapt to that change on the small stage before having to adapt on a much larger stage.
Wasn't that a point that Bouton touched on in Ball Four, also? I can't remember but it sounds familiar.
Shine on.
In 17 2/3 at Rochester, Crain gave up 13 hits (zero HR), 8 BBs (none intentional) and 5 runs. He struck out 22 and threw 3 WPs and compiled an impressive 1.62 tRA (league avg is 4.08).
in 71 BF, he had 41 balls in play: 39 pct GB, 24 pct FB, 19 pct LD. SSS, obviously (that's ~one extra LD compared to his ML career averages of around 16 pct). [add: the one thing that is really out of whack is his swinging strike rate: 13.5 pct compared to his more typical 7-8 pct]
The Ks are nice, the walks not so much. But if he can keep the ball in the park (stay near his typical 5pct HR/BIA), he can be very useful to this club.
Birthday list:
Ginger Beaumont (1876)
Hod Ford (1897)
Jimmie Wilson (1900)
Ival Goodman (1908)
Ray Scarborough (1917)
Pee Wee Reese (1918)
Johnny Groth (1926)
Don Drysdale (1936)
Nomar Garciaparra (1973)
Minor league reports will be on hiatus until at least Saturday, more likely Sunday, and possibly Monday.
Here's me over the weekend. Look at that form!
Nice socks!
Nice hip turn!
Can you play second base?
It looks to me like you are swinging a bit early.
Did Johan throw you that changeup?
Is that cricket?
Here are some preliminary photos from my trip out to western ND, as I mentioned on Monday:
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=28844&id=1409850010&l=5e7700f79c
there are a lot of stories and explanations to go with these, I should get around to writing something more extensive up. This is a start, though.
Those pictures are fantastic. Made me miss home for sure.
Hey, nice pics, particularly the burger.
Harmon speaks about steroids and the Hall of Fame
Ugh. Harmon's not too high-horsey here, but the 90's were not the first era that baseball players cheated. Though I do agree with assertion that perhaps caring about records at all is pointless, other than for trivia. I certainly don't care that Bonds passed Aaron.
That's exactly where I'm at on records. In fact, the HR record is important for one reason: Babe Ruth, whore monger, was an American hero. If someone from Cleveland had set the record, it probably wouldn't mean as much. More than seventy years after he last played, Ruth's influence is still being felt across the sports landscape. You can hit a baseball (or throw a football or dunk a basketball) and have a media savvy persona? Well, then, you can do no wrong (and hey, feel free to enjoy the favors of however many women you want, regardless of your marital status, whether they be prostitutes or unwilling partners, as if any woman would actually be unwilling, wink). When we're old, we'll get misty-eyed recounting the myth surrounding you.
The record surely would not have meant as much, but would still have been iconic.
How many players are responsible for fundamentally changing the way the game is played? Not many: Ruth in baseball, Mikan in basketball, maybe Paul Brown in football?
Obviously, an important part of Ruth's place in the American sports psyche is due to his having played in New York. But a much bigger part has to do with his ridiculous performance in the most important sport.
like Wayne Gretzky, who became famous in Edmonton of all places.
It wasn't just Ruth's homers. The homers was just one part of his absolutely amazing ability to play baseball. If he had hit 700 homers but never pitched, had an average of .240, and rarely walked, I don't think he would be quite as iconic. That's not to say Musial would have taken his place as the sports hero (likely Gehrig or Dimaggio), but it's possible.
Well, Mike Sweeney has a lot of Records, Season HRs and Season Avg, but he got those in KC, and no one even noticed. He probably has the career HR record by now for all I know.
Well, my sons little league season came to an abrupt end last night. A couple of us Dad's coached an expansion team of 3-4th graders. Every other team had returning 4th graders, where all of our 4th graders were facing live pitching for the first time. We started out 0-3, then scored 11 runs in the final inning of our4th game to win 12-11.That sparked our confidence, and we eventually won 4 out of our final 6 games to finish 6-10. 5 more experienced teams finished below us.
I have coached on and off for 20 years, and this group of kids have renewed my confidence that our society is not doomed, as naysayers will tell us. 12 kids who listened to coaching, applied what they learned, rooted hard for their teammates despite many let downs, never gave up, and simply loved the game all summer.
We got beat last night by a really good team, but the kids competed well. It broke my heart to see their season end. On a positive note, lil' zooomx really was hitting the crap out of the ball the last 5 games and moved up to #3 in the lineup as a 3rd grader. He already hits better than I ever could... the little creep.
I think my 3-year old already bats better than I ever did. But that's because I had more suck in me than yesterday's game.
Live pitching for the first time in 4th grade? That seems old. I was facing live pitching in 2nd grade. I know a lot of leagues don't allow kids to pitch any more until they're 10, but most allow coaches to pitch.
There's nothing better than exciting little league baseball playoffs. Here's a link from my then 5th graders influential playoff run of 2006.
Allegedly, Ben Roethlisberger is a very bad man who belongs in prison. I just happened across this story on Deadspin, because ESPN is refusing to report that the QB for the Super Bowl champion Pittsburgh Steelers is being sued for sexual assault. It's impossible to know at this point if this is a valid suit or not. Is this woman a gold digger who is trying to entrap an ultra rich superstar? Or is she the victim of a heinous criminal? I don't know.
I do know one thing, though. I would never want my daughter involved with a professional athlete.
not even Joe Mauer?
Jeebus doesn't marry. At least not publicly.
I'd go down a notch and include college athletes. Especially football players.
I had the same reaction. I read that story yesterday and wondered why it was no where to be found on ESPN.
I think it's legitimate for the media not to jump on allegations until they can have a better idea of whether or not it's a valid suit. Widely publicizing allegations is going to be damaging to the more prominent party even if he's done nothing wrong, and there's no particular reason I can see that we need to be in a hurry to trumpet allegations.
Well yes, there's that. ESPN is now reporting the story, with the angle that no criminal complaint is being filed. There is a lawsuit filed and the plaintiff has an extensive record of mental health problems after the alleged incident.
The story was being reported in most other media outlets, but not at ESPN, which, of course, is pretty submissive to the NFL. (Remember the NFL's reaction to the little football soap opera that ESPN ran?) So, the questions are two-fold. Is this newsworthy? Was ESPN not reporting it because of their relationship with the NFL? I'm not pretending to know the answers, just like I don't know whether Big Ben raped this woman. I'm just identifying the questions.
As for the valid suit issue, I can tell you that it is a valid suit in that it has been filed. It isn't just someone who is alleging something, she has actually hired lawyers put together a complaint that alleges some pretty awful things, including Roethlisberger luring the woman into his room under false pretenses and forcibly raping her, and filing the suit. At what point do we determine whether the plaintiff's claims have enough merit to discuss? Well, lawyers who knowingly file suits without merit are at least subject to sanctions. So, the fact that some lawyer was willing to sign the complaint is at least some evidence that the suit has merit (okay, stop laughing!!!). If the case gets to discovery, is that newsworthy? How about if the suit is settled? Is that newsworthy? (I think that is newsworthy, and I think that most would agree that if the starting QB settles a sexual assault case out of court, that's pretty newsworthy. But, hey, does that mean he's liable? No.)
Roethlisberger read a statement denying the allegations. It's now newsworthy.
Here's the text of his statement:
Note that he didn't say, "I didn't have sex with that woman."
I wonder if the ESPN talking heads are still going to call him Big Ben Rothethlisberger.
Its sad how pervasive stories like this are in pro sports/the world in general.
Working with the mentally ill, there's not too many men that don't eventually get accused of being inappropriate with a female client, especially if they have a personality disorder. Granted, it usually doesn't get all the way to lawsuit territory, but still.
If Ben does get cleared of this, knowing that the woman is mentally ill should hopefully help his reputation from being tarnished.
Did she have problems before the alleged assault? Unknown.
Her lawyer is part of a two-lawyer law office. He's been in the practice for a long time (since at least the early 1970s), and maybe he's a really effective attorney. But, if I had such a case, I'd be going for a law firm that's larger than that. Such a case requires resources. So, that's not a particularly good move by her and I wonder if she shopped the case to larger firms before settling on effectively a solo practitioner. This isn't a land dispute between two neighbors. She is suing an extremely wealthy man and an extremely wealthy company. I would imagine her lawyer is not used to the power he's going to face.
Moss concurs...either a bad move, or a desparate one.
Is it possible that he's had concussion-related memory loss?
for what it's worth, at the end of the story today is this:
I know I haven't been around for a while, but I do have a fundraiser going on for the walk. TODAY at 10p my team's online silent auction is going to close. You can view the items and then bid on them via my blog: .
Also, the "Walks for a Walker" program will end on July 31. So, lets hope for 100 twins walks in the next week! :) Thank you for your support!
ok, i did the link thing wrong. The blog is onepinksprinkle.blogspot.com
Hey Sheenie, saw your mugshot in one of the local lawyer rags recently!!
Yup. Then you are a member of the HCBA or MSBA. I am in the HCBA for being the co-chair of the new lawyers section. I also heard I was in the MSBA mag for going to the convention...
Hey now, you've met Moss a time or two...Moss is the good kind of lawyer, like you, your FIL, and SBG.
"the good kind of lawyer"???!!!111one!!!??
She needs a mugshot purgatory!
Day four of the WellsFargo / Slaughterhouse siege continues with a new twist: The sellers decided not to repair a minor structural problem (wood rot on the door leading into the garage) and according to FHA lending rules WellsFargo won't release the funding.
So, what should have been the day that Dr. Chop and I joined the rest of in-debt america has instead turned into a nightmare of finger pointing and blamestorming.
That sucks.
Isn't that fun. Sorry, meat. I hope that things eventually work out.
That's awful. Can't you just buy a damn door at Menard's?
The closing on our place in IL lasted nine hours due to an incompetent broker. That was one of the most stressful days of my life.
No reflection on meat and Dr. Chop, but I've been on the selling side of an un-fun real estate transaction. Flat/declining market so that we were already taking a loss on the sale, and the buyer comes to the closing with a set of novel, petty demands. I was so pissed I almost canceled the sale, even though we were literally (and physically) leaving town (Champaign, IL) for California that day.
our real estate agent got pissed at their real estate agent too. thankfully, we had our lawyer there, and she kept a cool head and control of the situation. I learned the value of having a lawyer involved in those transactions right there.
I understand that selling a house sometimes includes doing things that you don't want to. But, these sellers agreed to list it as a FHA available house and then balked at the needed repairs. F-them.
I asked that they replace 4 screens that were damaged, they said no, our realtor told me that she'll pay for the screens in order to get us into the house and we agreed to that. We really don't give a fuck about screens, I don't care that they painted the master bedroom iridescent silver or that the carpet looks like several kindergarden classes have puked and had diarrhea all over it. We like the house, it needs some work, we want to buy it, we don't give an eff about the small stuff and the sellers tried to cheap out on us.
I call bullshit.
it is amazing how buyers or sellers can sometimes get themselves all twisted up about petty things. again, no intended or implied criticism to you, meat.
my intended point was that the closing is not the appropriate place for dickering. It should be for confirming that each side has met expectations in good faith and for signing the damn paperwork.
Doc, to be clear: I didn't take anything you said as criticism of my situation, I'm just fed up, that's all.
No offense taken and, I hope, none given. I sympathize.
Shooter:
Shooter! That's just piling on.
OMG! Shooter in the same article on regression to the mean:
Of course, that reliance on batting average as a metric for HOF consideration is a little less than astute, but hey, he's actually dancing in the neighborhood of small sample size issues.
That's just how we roll in St. Paul.
I have a story to share that might only be interesting to me but there is an off chance that someone will find it interesting. And if someone finds it interesting, that someone would probably be visiting this website.
When I was in high school in Iowa, they had a baseball rule allowing a designated runner. It is similar to the designated hitter, but it would be for running the bases. After the pitcher or catcher gets on base, the designated runner can run. The pitcher or catcher would then re-enter the game. I think the thinking was to get the catcher off the base paths and back into his equipment to keep the game moving. I'm not sure why they also allowed a runner for the pitcher.
I was a track guy that played baseball (a little like Happy Gilmore was a hockey guy that played golf) so I was the perfect designated runner. And our catcher was a tough farm boy wrestler who sported an OBP somewhere north of .750 due to his ability to "take one for the team" on a nearly daily basis.
We started this particular season with a tournament. Our first game of the day was against Manning. They had just gotten done playing their first game. And, as we soon found out, they occupied the first base dugout in their first game but were now in the third base dugout.
As I sat into my usual spot on the bench as our team took the field, I noticed a piece of paper under my seat. I pick it up and see that it is a list of signs with "Manning" at the top. I talked to a friend of mine and we were both convinced that there was no way that they had left the signs in our dugout but we would watch closely to be sure.
A Manning runner got on first base in that first inning. The third base coach gave the steal sign and the runner proceeded to take off on the next pitch. We let the catcher know what was going on and my friend and I were able to alert him to 3 steal attempts and a squeeze play. I think the catcher ended up with 3-4 assists on the day. That is basically unheard of at this level. For instance, I was never thrown out by a catcher.
Getting back to the designated runner duties. It was always a goal of mine to steal home. I knew I was a runner more than a baseball player so I never had any foolish goals like hitting a walk-off home run (or any home run) but I really wanted to steal home.
The Manning catcher was a little guy with a terrible arm. He was just lollypopping the ball around the infield. But he was fearless and really involved in the game. I remember he was always talking and he'd throw down to every base constantly.
I ended up on third base. I can't remember if I stole my way there or just ended up there.
Anyway, there are two outs and my partner-in-crime from the bench (who is also one of my best friends) is at the plate. I take an ok lead at third base and the catcher throws a lollypop down to third. I get back easily. The third base coach leans into me and says "get a bigger lead this time and once he throws down, take off."
I'm psyched. Sure, it's not a straight steal of home like I would like but it still counts as a steal of home.
I take a big lead. The batter takes the pitch. The catcher lobs the throw to third and I take off for home. The return throw from the third baseman hits me in the back as I'm sliding into the plate. I jump up to give my friend at the plate a high five and he's just looking at me dejectedly. I look at the ump and he says, "The pitch was strike three. That's the third out of the inning. No run."
My one chance at the steal of home thwarted by my best friend. D'oh!
While going through the "good game" handshake line after the game, I give the sheet with the signs back to the catcher. He takes one look at it and just starts cracking up. That's the last time I'd really thought about that catcher until I read this article yesterday.
Cool!
Great story, Algonad. And I really, really, really want that catcher to have been Forman. 'cause that would be teh mosted awesome story evah!
Awesome story!
So you were a little like this guy?
Nice story, BTW.
Nice use of B-R.
A painter notices the details. ;)
Great story.
Speaking of NFL QBs, how perfect is this? Anguish! Ed Werder:
See, it's not about Brett! It's about the guys! Oh Brett, I LOVE YOU!
Kevin Seifert dares to deviate from the ESPN line:
No, that can't be!
I want more Brett Favre stories! I mean that. Normally, I bristle at off-season NFL news, but the Favre story always entertains me.
Allow me to bristle twice as hard to make up for your non-bristling.
I had my mind made up before, but this new BS is going to make me militant about it, I think.
ohhh geesh..Mark Buerhle has a perfect game going. 3 more outs to go
see ya perfecto! see ya no hitter!
Gabe Kapler with a lead off double
Really? Gameday changed its mind on me.
gamecast says Kapler flied out...
gameday had a double a moment ago..I swear
I saw it too.
Im glad I wasnt seeing things
Wise caught it at the wall. Buerhle was perfect.
Steve Wynn will need to alter the lyrics of "Harvey Haddix".
Too bad he has to tack on "Buehrle" and not "Baker."
I just caught the highlight of the Wise catch. holy moses! what a play
Did anyone else not know that JD and Stephen Drew had another brother in the Majors?
I knew they all existed... but I didn't know any of them were brothers.
Ah, the value of strikeouts. Twins have zero on Monday, allow 14 runs. Mark Buerhle has six today, hurls perfect game.
Is this the same guy we played whack-a-mole with just a couple weeks ago?
Yes, but we have a secret weapon: Carlos Gomez. Also Jose Morales if at Chicago.
I'm hoping we do this to him again in our series against the Sux next week. It would be delicious.
Looks like there might be a correlation to me.
Of course, you can't throw a perfect game if you walk anybody. Maybe there's a correlation there too...
I need Hawk's call of the final inning to go next to Scully/Koufax on my iPod.
Genre: Perfect Game 9th innings.
Of course, Koufax had 14Ks, including the last 4 batters, and a 1-run lead.
He wasn't a team player.
6 batters! Koufax struck out the last 6! What the hell was I typing?
what's worst: getting no hit/perfected by a good to great pitcher (like Buerhle), or getting shutout by a 'Jeremy' type pitcher
oh, Jeremy for sure. A perfect game takes skill, but also a lot of luck. There's no shame in getting perfectoed by a stud.
On a related note, which is worse: to be dominated by the same Jeremy in a shutout or to leave a dozen or more base runners, so you had plenty of guys reach but could not score. In the first case, you could say the guy just had it that day and give him credit and in the second you could say the guy was just lucky.
I am off to see Neko Case at an outdoor venue for free. Expect drunken typos from me, a la after the Wilco show, during tonight's gamelog.
Twist the Knife.