November 5, 2009

I don't know about you, but I kind of teared up when Hal Steinbrenner dedicated the 27th! championship to his dad, the convicted felon.

102 comments to November 5, 2009

  • SBG

    Wolves with a very good effort last night. They could very easily have won that game. I think the Celts were a little tired (six games in nine nights), but this is the NBA, man.

    • I probably sounds like a total homer/rube, but the Refs were giving nothing to the Wolves last night. Especially in the 4th quarter. KG was basically mugging whoever he was covering and nothing was called

      • I'm not a homer, and I think you're right. There wasn't anything Cuzzi-like going on, but I think two or three fouls should have been called on the Celts, and that could have made the difference.

      • When they called the jump ball at the end I was incredulous. Then, I saw the replay and sure enough KG had all ball somehow. As a proud season ticket holder of the Wolves (heh), it was nauseating to listen to the announcers pulling moral victories out of the air.

  • What a confused article about the Empire. I guess the title and conclusion match, but most of the middle is entirely too wrapped up in the "emotion" of it all.

  • SBG

    Brian Cashman after last night's World Series:

    On those teams [that won in the '90s], those guys were young. They weren't veteran guys like they are now. They had different roles. Derek Jeter wasn't a leader back then.

    • Hogwash. Jeter was a leader way back in 1973.

    • i got about three entries into the comments section, then i started to get all dizzy and light-headed, so i closed the browser.

      • i got about three entries into the comments section, then i started to get all dizzy and light-headed, so i closed the browser.

        sorry, that was for the bjhess article above. i'm sure the point would remain valid for this article too, though.

    • Cashman isn't perfect — no GM is — but he certainly made the right choices last offseason when he spent a combined $423.5 million on Sabathia, Burnett and Teixeira.

      He also made a shrewd decision the previous winter, when he declined to trade players such as Hughes and center fielder Melky Cabrera for Johan Santana, knowing an even better option — Sabathia — would be available as a free agent the following year.

      well, sure. Why bother making trades when you have an unlimited budget?

      • He's actually made some steal of some trades.

        Swisher for Betemit and grade C pitching prospect.

        Abreu and Corey Liddle (RIP) for 4 minor 'prospects'.

        Nady and Marte for actually quite a bit, Daniel McCutchen C+, Jose Tabata B+, Jeff Karstens, and Ross Ohlendorf C+. I liked this trade as a Pirates fan. I like N-Hunt.

        • But of course these were possible due to their ability to take on the salaries.

          Abreu was due over $31M over the next two years. Swisher due 21 over three. I still like the deals though. I think Cashman does a good job on the trade market.

  • NEW YORK (AP)—The New York Yankees bolted from the dugout even before the last grounder was scooped up. After waiting nine years for championship No. 27, no one would dare hold them back.

    “It feels better than I remember it, man,” captain Derek Jeter(notes) said. “It’s been a long time.”

    Nine Years! THE HORROR! Jeter is obviously the problem when he captains a team that goes NINE YEARS without a title. Sickening.

  • This next week I am going to miss Fire Joe Morgan more than usual.

  • World Series is over. Time to make that decision on Cuddy's 2011 option. Take it or leave it?

  • Mark Teahen to the White Sox.

    Mark Teahen was traded by the Royals to the White Sox for Chris Getz and their failed third-baseman Josh Fields.

    Teahen is going into his third arb year after getting $2.3375M and $3.575M. Say he gets $5M? (He was a super two, he has two years of arb left). He is due to replace Jermaine Dye in right. We can be sure the ChiSox buy up one of the 2B now, right?

  • Hey Boss, did you forget to set the clocks back this weekend? All the posts are timestamped an hour later than they're posted.

  • Akinori interested in a long term deal...

    "I'm definitely interested in the long term, but I first have to do what I can do. We'll see what happens. Hopefully, we can go to the playoffs next season."

    Akinori is going to change the culture of Pittsburgh baseball.

    I do really like this deal for the Pirates though. They could conceivably be a good team in a year or two if all of their young players take expected steps forward. If Lastings Milledge recovers from 'Rushed NYM OF prospect syndrome'.

    2011 could feature Pedro Alverez and Andrew McCutchen as legitimate stars at 24 years old each supplemented by a nice supporting cast of Milledge 26, LaRoche 27, Iwamura 33, Sanchez 23, and Tabata 22.

  • local seer predicts blockbuster trade:

    If the Twins can't re-sign free-agent shortstop Orlando Cabrera, it would be surprising if they don't consider Milwaukee's J.J. Hardy, who is expendable due to the emergence of Alcides Escobar. Lefty starter Glen Perkins would seem a likely bet to be included if there were an offer to the Brewers.

    jeez, where does he pick stuff like this up?

  • Some Twins-centric content on UniWatch today, complete with Earl Battey and Tony-O.

  • SBG

    From the AP story on last night's Wolves game:

    In just his third game back in the arena that he essentially built, it would be hard to imagine Garnett even recognized the franchise that he put on the map.

    Now just a minute. The Wolves played five seasons in Target Center before they drafted Kevin Garnett. Never mind that it's only the second game that he actually played in here as a member of the Celtics.

  • I have a ham sandwich with my homemade pickles and ranch dressing for lunch with Serenity on the big screen. Today's staring out alright.

  • So, Jim Nantz needs to pay his ex-wife several hundred thousand dollars a year until he dies? I mean, I can even maybe understand why the courts would expect him to pay at that level as long as he's making $3M/year, but no one can expect him to reasonably make that kind of money until he dies, right?

    • divorce. another reason why I'll never get married.

    • changes in material circumstances afford opportunities for renegotiation, I'd presume. $72K per month in alimony for life -- I think he had a cr@ppy lawyer.

    • Nantz, described by Owens as "our nation's most prominent sportscaster," filed for divorce last year from his wife after years of marriage counseling, according to the decree.

      Yeah, that Vin Scully guy is a total nobody.

      CBS sportscaster Jim Nantz must pay $916,000 yearly in alimony and child support to his ex-wife and give up their Connecticut home under terms of a newly issued divorce decree.

      ...

      He also must keep his ex-wife listed as beneficiary of a $3 million life insurance policy while he's still paying alimony and/or child support, and pay $70,000 so she can join any country club of her choice.

      She had been seeking more than $1.5 million in yearly alimony and child support.

      Speaking as the son of divorced parents (I don't have any memory of their marriage), I'm all for taking care of one's responsibilities to ensure that any children are well provided for, regardless of the custody situation. Alimony can certainly be appropriate, too, but I don't think that should mean that one spouse should be completely responsible for maintaining the quality of life to which the other had become accustomed. That simply excuses the party receiving the alimony of the personal responsibility to provide for their living situation.

      • DK

        "our nation's most prominent sportscaster,"

        I might go with Bob Costas here. Even for Nantz, though, Vin Scully is quite likely the nation's best sportscaster, but I'm skeptical that, even as much of an institution as he is, a sportscaster of a single team in a sport that isn't the nation's most popular is more prominent than a top team national broadcast guy of what's far and away the most popular sport.

      • That simply excuses the party receiving the alimony of the personal responsibility to provide for their living situation.

        I agree with that but I think if one spouse has forgone his/her career to raise the children, it should be recognized that the earnings power from 50-65 are severely limited. Without having some type of alimony available, you're basically allowing the earning spouse to yield all the power in the relationship. He/she could treat the other spouse terribly knowing that the non-earning spouse could never leave.

        • SBG

          Let's assume that the former or so to be former Mrs. Nance is 50, the same age as Jim. If she lives to the life expectancy of all women, 78 or so, she will get about $25 million in alimony, plus all of the other assets that she is getting, plus, he has to continue to pay the premium on a life insurance policy so that when he dies, she cashes in another $3 million, tax free.

        • I agree with that for the vast majority of cases, but realistically, did she give up a $900K/year career for this? In the short term, this doesn't seem like a terribly unreasonable settlement, it's just the idea that Nantz is on the hook for this until he dies. Like bS said, changes in material circumstances likely provide for the chance for renegotiation, but it seems like they could have worked something out where the payments became a little more pedestrian as Nantz gets older and it's no longer realistic to expect him to continue making what he's been making. Even if Nantz just paid her $900K/year until he was 65, it seems that if you invest that wisely, you should be able to leave really comfortably for the rest of your life on that. (Especially since she's getting a home and a condo in the settlement, too.) Plus, she gets to split his SAG pension and various joint accounts that they hold.

          I guess I'm not really that worried about Jim Nantz's financial future, but I doubt he can keep his job indefinitely, and I certainly wouldn't want that kind of payment hanging over my head while I contemplated retirement.

    • Did the judge start speaking in dramatic hushed tones and make strained references to past marriages?

      Nantz's schtick (the reverse Berman, if you will) is pretty fucking obnoxious. There has to be some sort of happy medium between reverential coverage and nonstop shouting.

  • SBG

    Sam Smith thinks LeBron winds up with the Lakers next year.

    I'd say that I'll have what he's smoking, but that's probably illegal stuff. The only way LeBron gets to LA is through a sign and trade. I think heads would explode if it happened. Cleveland would be better off letting him leave via free agency than to take back Lamar Odom and Andrew Bynum.

    • As someone living in flyover country, my opinion probably doesn't count for shit. But, if Lebron were to end up in LA during the prime of his career, I would totally, and completely lose interest in the NBA.

  • So, my creative writing teacher has been sick the last few weeks, and all he could find out is that it wasn't H1N1.

    He found out today that he has cancer.

    Thinking

  • SBG

    It just dawned on me that the curse of Ronan Tynan was a pretty darned good theory on my part.

    • I hate to break it to you, Boss, but you weren't the only one to dream it up independently. I had been hearing about it for a couple of seasons before this site was even hatched. Still, maybe we should get that obnoxious guy to sing again next year.

  • CC to 6: Can you shoot me your email. I have a theme week I would like to plan that I believe you might be able to help me Bogart. Sorry Doc, this is Bootsy territory, methinks.

  • One of the great things about music is its ability to provoke an emotional response, but sometimes that's a two-edged sword. I absolutely hate it that I can't listen to some of my favorite music because of who it reminds me of, and whenever it pops up on my shuffle, I have to change it.