|
|
Souhan says the Twins need bullpen help, and I think most Twins fans agree with that, but do the numbers? His timing of this column is odd given the Twins won a 2-1 game when their starter went just five innings. And the Twins' bullpen is getting better.
Bullpen ERA by month:
March/April: 6.14
May: 3.36
June: 2.54
Bullpen WHIP by month:
March/April: 1.585
May: 1.217
June: 1.19
Bullpen OPS against by month:
March/April: .825
May: .716
June: .670
There is a definite trend in the right direction for the bullpen as a whole and it has a lot to do with jettisoning dead weight like Luis Ayala, Craig Breslow, and Jesse Crain.
Still, Bobby Keppel's career numbers both in the majors and minors make it doubtful that this good start for him will continue much longer. R.A. Dickey has always been better as a reliever, which makes sense if you think about it*, I still wouldn't want to trust a knuckleballer with a one-run lead in the late innings what with passed balls, stolen bases, etc. His best attribute is a rubber arm which should allow the Twins to stay with 11 pitchers.
* I would think it would be easier to prepare for a knuckleballer if you know he's starting and you will face him at least a couple times. After facing 90-mph fastballs, that knuckleball junk can really throw you off, I would think.
Because of Gardy's reluctance to use Joe Nathan to help out in the eighth inning (did he at least consider bringing Nathan in to face Twins killer Miguel Oliva with two outs and the tying run at second base in the eighth inning last night?), it would make sense to go after a veteran set-up guy. Would they take Delmon straight up?
SBG  March 4, 2008, at 10:07 am  - (Sorry, but the time to add LTEs has expired) Justin Morneau, spring training, Torii Hunter, weight lifting
I read Reusse this morning talking about Justin Morneau's weightlifting routine. Apparently, he got a tip from Torii Hunter at some point after the start of last season -- keep lifting hard through spring training and don't go into maintenance until the season starts. I read that and wondered, "You mean to tell me that the Twins strength and conditioning people don't control the types of workouts that these guys are doing?" If I was paying players that much money, I'd be making sure some guy who knew what he was talking about was dispensing the advice.
Does working hard through spring training make a difference? Could it actually hurt? Does it actually help? I don't know. Man, the season can't start fast enough.
I was listening to Reusse on his Sunday morning show yesterday. When the topic of the Vikings came up, Patrick indicated that because of the national interest in running back Adrian Peterson, NBC was contemplating moving at least one (and possibly more) Viking games to the Sunday night time slot.
Mr. Reusse did not want this to occur, because that game time interferes with his ability to make deadline on stories. So, he wished that Peterson would suffer a "non-career threatening" injury so that the Vikings wouldn't be moved to the late time slot. Of course, Peterson was hurt on Sunday and the reports are that he has a partially torn lateral collateral ligament in his knee. So, good for you, Patrick. You won't be facing any imminent deadlines on your columns.
LENIII:
[W]hen a team repeatedly says it's too inconsistent, it translates to just not being good enough.
Remember that for future reference, in case you didn't know it already.
If you remember in the spring, Joe Mauer caused some hearts in Twinsville to flutter when he said that he had a "stress reaction" in his leg. I'll admit that I'd never heard of a stress reaction, but I'm no medical expert. Joe's had some injuries this season, but it does not appear that any of them were related to a stress reaction in his leg.
Top Jimmy, everyone's favorite hack took a swipe (more than one, actually) at Mauer's toughness in his latest "gem" of a column when he said the following:
In spring training [Mauer] caused a scare with what was termed a "stress reaction." I've spoken with trainers in other sports who have told me there is no such thing.
That seems to me to be a not-so-thinly veiled accusation that Mr. Mauer invented an injury. Trainers. In other sports. No such thing.
Top Jimmy apparently doesn't have access to The Google. Only recently moved from the Ditch, though, I do. I typed in "'stress reaction' bone" into The Mighty Google and my computer groaned and with a DING! it produced a link to the website of Dr. Stephen M. Pribut, D.P.M. Dr. Pribut is "a past President of the American Academy of Podiatric Sports Medicine (AAPSM), and past President of the District of Columbia Podiatric Medical Association. He served as Chair of the AAPSM Shoe Committee for 5 years. He currently serves on the American Podiatric Medical Association's Clinical Practice Advisory Committee." He's been in practice since 1980 and "specializes in Podiatric Sports Medicine". He has the following to say about stress reactions and fractures:
Chronic Repetitive Stress Injuries to Bone (stress fractures and stress reactions) often result from dramatic changes in training. Training errors of a variety of types are a major contributing factor to this type of injury. The use of the word “fracture†in many cases is a misnomer. There is in most grades of this injury no actual fracture line, although in the most significant and severe cases a fracture line is visible and seen on X-ray or more readily on an MRI scan. In a large number of these injuries it is actually a stress related injury or an over stress syndrome of a particular bone. This type of injury in the absence of x-ray signs (and sometimes in the absence of a positive bone scan or MRI scan) has, some years ago termed a pre-stress fracture, then a stress reaction of bone, all of which leads to much confusion within the terminology and among clinicians and patients.
Here's another source that discusses a stress reaction as being on the continuum of bone injuries suffered in sports related activities:
Another situation encountered in clinical practice is the painful, tender focal area of bone that demonstrates a mildly increased uptake of radioisotope, insufficient to be classified as a stress fracture. This has been termed 'stress reaction'. It would appear that there is a continuum of bone response to stress that ranges from mild (bone strain) to severe (stress fracture). The clinical features of bone strain, stress reaction and stress fractures are summarized in Table 2.5.
The authors of this page, Peter Brukner and Karim Kahn wrote a book entitled Clinical Sports Medicine.
Here's another description of a stress reaction from WEBMD's emedicine.com:
Advanced cross sectional imaging has demonstrated that bone responds to repetitive loading via a continuum of stress responses that precede the onset of clinical symptoms. In their study involving a cohort of military recruits, Kiuru et al reported that only 40% of the MRI findings suggestive of a low-grade bone stress injury correlated with clinical symptoms (Kiuru, 2005). The vast majority of the radiographically detected areas of bone stress reaction remained clinically silent despite uninterrupted training, and disappeared upon follow-up imaging at the conclusion of the 5-month training program. Therefore, under normal circumstances, bone appears able to keep up with necessary repairs without manifesting clinically significant injury as it remodels in accordance with Wolff law. However, when a bone's reparative and adaptive capacity is overwhelmed by chronic overload, damage can begin to accumulate. If allowed to progress, this multifactorial process may eventually result in a stress fracture.
But, the trainers that Top Jimmy talked to never heard of it. That's good enough for Top Jimmy. Besides, those stupid doctors have websites. Can't trust them over some trainer.
The latest Arbitron ratings indicate that the Twins ratings on radio are up substantially over last year, despite their move from WCCO to KSTP, but that KSTP's ratings are otherwise flat. Very interesting.
First of all, WCCO's claims during negotiations that the Twins needed them -- and Grandpa's prediction that the Twins would really regret leaving WCCO -- have been proven ridiculous. Attendance is up, radio ratings are up, even when on an absolutely inferior radio station to WCCO.
Second, this has been a no win for KSTP. They pay a million dollars a year for the privilege of having the Twins use their airwaves. In addition, the Twins also control the majority of the ad sales for the game broadcasts, as well as the pre- and postgame. In other words, KSTP doesn't actually get any revenue at all during the time that the games are on the air. The hope, of course, is that having the Twins will increase ratings across the board. That hasn't happened. So, really, what incentive does KSTP have to re-up with the Twins, unless their ratings improve?
Who knows who will carry the Twins after this contract is over. I'm sure someone will. But, they'll do it knowing that the Twins will not necessarily provide any benefit to them whatsoever. I would seriously doubt that WCCO will get the Twins, although if they've been suffering, it might make sense. Then again, I hear that Carl Pohlad has been buying radio stations. Maybe the Twins will end up on one of his stations.
Joe Christenson writes that beat reporters "walk a fine line when stating our opinions."
I'll bet that is only the case when his opinion differs from that of the Twins organization.
Beat writers report facts basically, and I don't have much of a problem with that. In order to get access to those facts, they have to have relationships with players. The players that treat them well make their jobs easier. Players and managers are more inclined to treat the beat writer better when there is positive stuff in the newspaper. So, positive stuff gets put in the newspaper. Negative stuff, like a star player berating a minor league beat writer, does not make the paper.
Our intrepid beat writers are so afraid of losing access that they tremble when they work up the gumption to suggest that batting Punto ninth and Joe Mauer second would be a good idea.
Christenson:
La Velle weighed in with an opinion about the batting order a few weeks back, and Ron Gardenhire really let him have it. “Nice blog,†Gardy kept saying, and while it was all in good fun, it was a reminder that beat writers — those of us who face these guys every day — walk a fine line when stating our opinions.
Yeah, wouldn't want to have to face the manager after suggesting that he is less than perfect. No wonder everyone thinks that the Twins are just better human beings than the rest of major league baseball (except for that mean Kyle Lohse).
In this episode, Dick hints at a couple of startling admissions about the dark side of Bunto-Ball, and Bert makes a puzzling statement, begging the question which his partner leaves unasked.
Scene: Metrodome, Monday afternoon, bottom of the 6th inning, 1 out, runners on 2nd & 3rd; White Sox 4, Twins 3. Nick Punto hits a routine grounder to the 1B Paul Konerko, but reaches the bag safely by outrunning P Jose Contreras, who is slow to cover the bag. Strangely, he does not slide.
DICK: I wonder if the Twins didn't have a team meeting [after Justin Morneau awkwardly landed on his shoulder while trying to dive into 1st base the night before]. If ever there was an opportunity where it would make sense for a runner to dive head-first, it would be with the pitcher trying to reach to tag the runner; and Punto instead runs through the bag and reaches safely.
First pitch delivered to the next batter, Michael Cuddyer. Dick calls the action, then continues.
DICK: As lighthearted as the mood was after the game last night, you wonder if Punto and the rest of the Twins have been told, 'OK, that's enough. Enough is enough. None of this anymore. We're banged up enough as it is.'
BERT: Oh, I don't think so. That's part of Nick Punto's game. I just think he saw Contreras running, and he knew he could beat him to the bag; and the quickest way is a straight line, rather than to dive.
End scene.
Not too much today. I just wanted to comment on a couple of Reusse’s latest columns.
A while back, in a deliberately sophomoric swipe at Ol’ Patrick, I showed everyone that I used his column on bloggers as a wrap for spent kitty litter. Of course, that was aimed as a rebuttal toward his sophomoric “homeless blogger†image. His problem with the whole blogging phenomenon aside, I really respect Reusse’s ability to write very good columns. He’s come through with a couple of good ones, in my opinion, recently.
The other day, he wrote about Ramon Ortiz, the Twins $3 million insurance policy for the starting rotation. It's a fluff piece, yes, but I enjoyed it. He paints a picture of Ortiz as being a gung-ho guy and someone who enjoys the game. Reusse also gives us a shiny little nugget – that the Twins had an interest in signing Gilgameche – but at one year, $3 million, not 5 years, $55 million. They also admitted that Ortiz wasn’t really on their list of candidates. In other words, Reusse intimates that the Twins were scraping the bottom of the barrel with Ortiz in the middle of a puff piece. Enjoyable article.
Today, Reusse writes another fine piece on Tommy Watkins. Watkins is a career minor leaguer and a lifetime resident of Fort Myers. He’s scuffled – three years at rookie ball – and at 26 he’s only had 2 1/2 months at AAA. But, there he was the last couple of days, getting an opportunity to play with the big club and he’s made a few plays. Watkins may never make the majors, but for two days, he’s basked in a warm glow. Ah, spring training. Ain’t it great? Reusse also provides some delicate context about race in the clubhouse. The black players stick together. I suppose that's not too surprising, but it makes you wonder – is there an invisible barrier on the team between whites and blacks? I’m not suggesting a malicious thing here, but I just wanted to point out Reusse’s attention to that dynamic.
Anyway, hats off to Reusse. I’ll have to find something else to hold the next batch of cat litter.
I just got home a few minutes ago and I went onto the deck, grabbed a bottle of beer, popped it into my bottle couzie and sat down at the computer. So, yes, I’ll admit that I was having a brewski while writing this post. However, since I started writing this before I started drinking the beer and because the idea for this post was in my head before I wrote it, I wouldn’t say that the post is alcohol fueled or anything. Besides, even if I’d drunk the whole thing first, at my size it’s gonna take more than a bottle of beer to get me to the point where I’m babbling incoherently (or at least because of the alcohol).
It seems that everyone these days is self-absorbed. I mean, Gleeman’s got the ear thing going on, and Reusse, well we know that he’s written a few columns that were alcohol fueled back in the day – and I’m beginning to wonder if his latest diatribe wasn’t ghost written by Johnny Walker. I’m a big fan of Reusse – hell I stole the name “Stick and Ball Guy†from one of his columns – but it’s pretty apparent that he doesn’t think much of me or my kind. I suppose you could call Reusse a little bit of a blogger bigot. That’s a little disappointing – I’ve always thought that Ol’ Pat was a good guy. But, he’s got a stereotypical image of a blogger as being some loser writing in his undershorts in Mom’s basement. I might write a few columns in my undershorts, but the woman in this place isn’t my mother. Although, you’d never know it sometimes the way she bosses me around. Good grief. Let me give you an example. On Sunday mornings, I have to go and get a copy of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. I don’t read the Strib – in print, that is. Hell, that woman needs her paper. I read it online.
Click here to continue reading What To Do With That Paper...
On Sunday, TJ was talking about access to athletes and I missed it. Link:
Long after he spoke on the field and said nothing and spoke in a news conference and said nothing, Peyton Manning stood in front of his locker, well after the Super Bowl ended, and held court, and suddenly he was likeable.
He told stories, joked about his teammates, made fun of himself, spoke of his family and his plans to celebrate. This is why access matters to sportswriters -- access turns ciphers and cartoon characters into real people.
Or, if the player is savvy, access turns ciphers and cartoon characters into PR images. It's absolutely freaking hilarious that Manning -- who has been the best player in the game for the last five years and the most criticized is now lauded as being real people and likeable. I think there was a lot of realness and likability in Manning before -- his frustration with not winning the big one was apparent in his actions on the field. Yes, he criticized teammates -- in other words, he made some mistakes -- but he was also striving and straining to achieve. Quite likable in my book, even if he hadn't won. He'd competed with the best of them. But, now that he's won, he's affable and providing some access into a sunny side. Hey, if I was the winning quarterback in the Super Bowl, I'd be affable, too. He's won, he's told a few stories. He's human. Blecch.
Ah yes. It's all about the access. Because with access comes good quotes, stories that write themselves, and human drama, no matter how contrived it might be. Without access, you have to rely on analysis. And hell, who wants to provide that?
But, yes, given the current state of affairs, this statement by TJ is undeniably true:
This is why the Vikings have made a terrible mistake by limiting access to their key people.
If Childress was more forthcoming with the press, they might provide him more cover. As it is, the locals are out for blood. Childress made the mistake of not kissing the established local media's collective ass. Big mistake. An even bigger mistake than being an incompetent football coach.
Update: If TJ were to use his access, say, to get some information rather than feel-good stories, he wouldn't have had this in his Sunday column: "Twins negotiate with M&M Boys: Doesn't look good for long-term deals with Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau...." Heh.
Top Jimmy:
McHale's willingness to fire coaches when players mutiny and Garnett's unwillingness to publicly reprimand recalcitrant teammates leave Wittman on globally warmed ice.
This article is about Mr. Ricky Davis, the under-achieving headache that is just one of a myriad of problems at 600 First Avenue North. Davis has been a problem everywhere he's been. Why, though, Top Jimmy thinks that Garnett's lack of a public smackdown of Davis leaves Wittman on thin ice is beyond me. Does Top Jimmy know something about where KG stands? Is KG, in private, taking Ricky Davis's side? If so, why not say it? If not, why is a public airing of dirty laundry required? If KG is showing a good face in public and supporting the coach behind the scenes, I'm good with that. I don't hear KG undercutting the coach. Do you? Cause if he's not undercutting the coach, it hardly seems fair to say that he's left Wittman on thin ice.
I'd much rather have the coach make statements about players, anyway. It shows a respect for the coach to defer such matters to him, in my opinion. Mr. Hunter's 2005 comments about Morneau and Mauer didn't seem to do anything but contribute to the malaise that was that forgettable season. If Ron Gardenhire's Come-To-Jesus meeting with Justin Morneau really did do the trick in 2006, I will say this: it wasn't accompanied (thankfully) by a calling out by Torii Hunter. The manager did his job. And here, the job is to be done by Mr. Randy Wittman. In this case, I say good luck, brother.
Top Jimmy's right about one thing, though. This mess ain't Wittman's fault. And it sure wasn't Dwane Casey's fault.
Top Jimmy strikes again. At the end of a pretty good column about the SuperDuperBowl he ends with this line:
Plus, a Colts victory could be dangerous -- the celebration might force Indianapolis to shut down its street.
Try the veal. Tip your wait staff. I'm here all week.
Top Jimmy:
In fact, [Kevin McHale]'s no longer even first in line for taking blame. That honor now belongs to Taylor, the genial but obtuse owner.
Taylor has allowed McHale, perhaps one of the three worst sports executives in the nation, to fire two coaches in three seasons. McHale has done so during seasons hamstrung by players who he chose -- Sam Cassell and Latrell Sprewell under Flip Saunders, and James, Davis and Griffin under Casey.
That McHale never has paid for his mistakes means that Taylor has now ascended the Wolves' throne of culpability. McHale's bumbling has become rewarded behavior.
Blinded by McHale's once-winning personality and on-court greatness, Taylor unconditionally handed him the reins, without demanding of McHale what he would demand of any other highly ranked employee in any of his ventures -- around-the-calendar diligence and accountability.
Or maybe we just think alike. Or maybe this is just so damned obvious it should be shouted from the housetops all over the state until Taylor pulls his head out and fires McHale. And to think I once wished that Taylor would buy the Twins. Heavens, NO! No way do I want that.
Sid:
This is a tough blow for Childress, who thought so much of Tomlin that he gave him complete control of the defense. The players had so much respect for Tomlin because he was so smart and so knowledgeable and was super at handling people.
But I have complete confidence that Childress will find a good replacement for Tomlin. The Vikings will still play their schedule next season.
Yeah, but will anyone notice?
|
Cup of Coffee  88 LTEs
Wolves lose again by 22, Kevin Love down to 17 minutes. This is the worst possible situation for the Wolves. They are driving what is left of their fan base with a tremendous stretch of terrible basketball. Their best, or second-best, player has checked out and is getting buried on the bench. I doubt that Love is in their long term plans. How's that O.J. Mayo deal looking now?
Retired WGOM Jokes
- "The Twins should have drafted Mark Prior."
Race to the Bottom: Highest Loss Totals in T-Wolves History 67: 1991-92
63: 1992-93
62: 1993-94
61: 1994-95
60: 1989-90, 2007-08
58: 2008-09
56: 1995-96
55: 2009-10
|
Recent Letters to the Editor
In Response to Cup of Coffee: March 18, 2010,
brianS wrote: Yea, Marquette did me no favors.
davidwatts wrote: I was very disappointed that the Mankato CBS station went to the Marquette game instead of sticking to the UNI game and my bracket is done blown up!
meat wrote: Cc to Andrew: I'm suddenly going to be in Dublin for a short weekend this summer (late June), any suggestions would be good as to where to stay / eat drink / be Irish.
spookymilk wrote: Boy oh boy, would most of those references be lost on my...let's call them …
twayn wrote: Danke! Bummer that there's no radio for Friday's game with the Mets. Slowey vs. Johan.
Klawitter wrote: Working in Century City. Living for the moment in Westwood, at least until I sell my place in DC this spring and move everything.
New Britain Bo wrote: How's this for script idea: At a planning session for an … a committee of twelve Indians (4 dot, 4 feather, 4 West) hires a crack director to run their event. He shows up at…
DK wrote: I missed this earlier today since I was apparently too busy … in the Nightmare thread, but I'd be down with this too. In fact, I'd probably be willing to contribute to coverage.
Milt on Tilt wrote: I'm picking up my puppy tomorrow. I couldn't be more excited.
spookymilk wrote: Oh, and Rhu: one of my challenges in this week's Survivor game was to do a six-word evaluation of Lew Zealand. These were the … flinger never flounders for puns. Better than Belladonna with fish…
In Response to Nightmares at WGOMville,
hungry joe wrote: i wasn't planning on going out, but two heavies from my company were in town, and they took me out for a crazy night (got home at 2, and i've been hating life most of…
spookymilk wrote: I instantly love the person who took that photo, hungry man. I'm sitting here drinking Bass; yesterday I went the nostalgia route with my St. Pat's choice, opting for a drink that reminded me of college…
hungry joe wrote:
Milt on Tilt wrote: hehe. Beer.
spookymilk wrote: To be fair, drama is kind of the world I live in. I'm prone to exaggeration. Plus, I'm drunk because this script is making me tense and I needed to take the edge…
Milt on Tilt wrote: Yeah, man. I wouldn't "disregard" it either, because it was truly a horrifying move. Oh come now. That's just being completely over dramatic.
Milt on Tilt wrote: O-Cab lead the majors in Outs as a batter in 2009. Call me … Jimmy Rollins actually did. But Cabrera was second, and first in the AL. Even so. I could use that same…
nibbish wrote: I don't know what to make of it. On one hand, Cabrera was made of suck. On the other, any shortstop we put in there was going to. I'd have to side with DK and…
spookymilk wrote: Yeah, man. I wouldn't "disregard" it either, because it was truly a horrifying move. 0-Cab cleared the bases for the team's best hitter over and over. I know it's nice to remember…
DK wrote: O-Cab was a baseball band-aid over a severed limb. Acting like doing that was a "victory" is what seems foolish to me.
In Response to Luna - 23 Minutes In Brussels (Tell Me Do You Miss Me),
E-6 wrote: Love me some Luna.
In Response to Cup of Coffee: March 17, 2010,
brianS wrote: I dunno. But we're not really talking about a legal argument so much as an ethical one, I think.
Moss wrote: The old "you can't have your coke and snort it too" … can't get a conviction on a … test...and is possession of any amount of coke a felony??
hungry joe wrote: tell me about it...
brianS wrote: It is hard to consume if you do not possess.