Good Lord! 10:10 a.m. (Pacific) start! This is soooo wrong!
Our first nooner of the season. What to do? Red Dawg is probably? not available to catch with an opposing lefty on the mound!
Pitching matchup: Jarrod Washburn (L, 5-14, 4.75 ERA, 83 tRA+ in 2008) vs. Glen "Cake-n-Steak" Perkins (L, 12-4, 4.41 ERA, 78 tRA+ in 2008). By tRA+, this game should be a shoot-out. Washburn dropped from "average pitcher" to "Jeremy" last season and he's a lefty, AND this is a contract year for him, so this game could be a struggle for our homeboys. The Mariners have scored 6, 5 and 5 in the three games to date; the Twins 1, 6 and 6. I'm thinking that the over/under on this game should be about 11.
Perkins the Pony may be a hometown hero, but so far his performance has suggested nothing more than back-of-rotation starter or long reliever. His 74:39 K:BB ratio (151 innings) last year doesn't exactly inspire confidence, nor does the 25 HRs he allowed. But if it makes you feel any better, Washburn's ratio was 87:48 K:BB (151.67 innings) with 19 HRs. Let's hope Sheenie makes a lot of money off of Washburn today.
ICHIRO! has been cleared to play and is expected to be activated for today's game. That's good for baseball and the Mariners, if not so good for us. Good thing he's a selfish player, otherwise I'd be more concerned.
In other news, Baby J did some hitting and caught a bullpen session from Light Rail yesterday. LENIII said yesterday that Baker is expected to start on Friday. As for Joe -- "soon." The way Jose Morales is swinging the bat so far, "soon" can't come soon enough.
Finally, will today be the day that the Black Bar is laid to rest at the WGOM? Will the Boss actually get to participate in a game log? Inquiring minds want to know. I hope to join you, but may be distracted by, you know, work.
I was driving down the road from Eagan (which the Headquarters of The WGOM, in case you haven't heard) to the beautiful city of Winona yesterday afternoon when the thought struck me, man I hate making this drive. No, that wasn't it, although there's some truth to that, too. I thought, man, maybe Billy Smith just really played the Seattle Mariners big time. Yep, Jarrod Washburn is a pretty sucktastic pitcher and he's in no way one of the five best pitchers on this club (unless we traded about three of our guys to get him), but maybe he was really just blocking the White Sox.
Washburn and his 4.95 xFIP doesn't exactly look like anything much when lined up against the White Sox pitchers, either. He looked like even less of a deal for them last week before Jose Contreras got hurt. It's not inconceivable that the White Sox would be interested, especially since Contreras might be out most of next year, too, if he ever gets back. He almost makes sense in Chicago.
Plus, Billy tried to pry Adrian Beltre from the Mariners last month and he found out that they wanted the moon and the stars for Beltre, so there's pretty good evidence right there that they aren't (why not? because they are delusional) interested in a salary dump. Then, the Yankees made an offer for Washburn before the deadline that Seattle didn't take. It doesn't seem likely that they'd just dump him for nothing two weeks later. They are irrational, but it's quite possible that they are consistent -- they expect to fleece everyone the way that they got fleeced in the Bedard trade. They expect other teams to take their shit and "give them value" for it, as if reducing their payroll by $13 million isn't value.
Washburn himself was absolutely dying to come to the Twins. Just read this from Larry Stone, a Seattle beat writer:
If you wondered about Jarrod Washburn's reaction to not being traded, he wore it on his face as he walked into the clubhouse today. He did not look happy. And, it turned out, he wasn't. He said he found out yesterday about the possible Twins' trade about the same time he found out it wasn't happening.
"I had mixed emotions,'' he said. "I was happy and upset at the same time."
The happiness came from the possibility of being traded to the Twins, which was just about the top team on his list of possible destinations. His home, he said, is an hour and a half drive away.
"If the rumors are accurate, it's too bad,'' he said. "It would have been ideal. It would have been perfect. It would have gotten me to a place that's contending and it's in my own damn backyard.''
On the rumors that the Twins were offering Boof Bonser, Washburn said: "If that was the case, how much more do you think you're going to get? A young guy with a great arm who's cheap.''
What do you think the clubhouse is like in Seattle these days? Washburn is openly admitting he wants out and basically telling the front office, you fools, you got a great deal there and you turned it down!
A little more reading from Mr. Stone confirms that the Mariners are absolutely kidding themselves. Here's the general manager:
"In general, on the issue of dumping salaries, our goal here is to get better. Even back to the trade deadline, and moving forward, we want to get players back that will make us better now and in the future. Money can give you flexibility, but there's no guarantee you can turn that flexibility into anything.
"I've said all along, with players under our control that people are assuming we want to move, we'd like to get value back for them. We want to get the best deal we can get for them, now or later. Other deals may come along and develop into something larger, and even involve us eating some money to get players that make us better.''
On the issue of "no guarantee that can turn that flexibility into anything," the USS Mariner retorts
This off-season, at least one free agent pitcher who has superior numbers to Washburn will sign a one-year deal for under Washburn’s 2010 salary of $10m. And here, I mean numbers indicative of a pitcher’s ability:
* Strikeout rate
* Walk rate
* Line drive rate (and HR rate)
* Ground ball/fly ball split
I predict this year we’ll see at least one pitcher who is clearly superior enough to Washburn to make arguing moot, but here’s our specific criteria: at least 180 IP in 2008, K rate equal or better than Washburn’s, walk rate equal or better than Washburn, LD/HR rate equal or better than Washburn’s. They will sign a deal for one year for less than $10m. Bonus points for 2y under $10m.
I’ll make an additional secondary prediction: there will be at least one free agent hitter who signs a one-year deal for under $10m who would provide a +20 run overall upgrade at a Mariner position from this year, with offense measured by any reasonable advanced metric and defense by UZR, PMR, +/-, or any like decent defensive stat.
Yep, we weren't dealing with anybody smart here, and I'm going to hope that old Billy was crazy like a Fox.
Well, you’ve got your diamonds and you’ve got your pretty clothes
And the chauffeur drives your car
You let everybody know
But don’t play with me, ’cause you’re playing with fire
On August 1, 2008, the Twins designated Livan Hernandez for assignment and called up Francisco Liriano. Since this move was made after the trading deadline, the Twins had to offer waivers on Hernandez and he was claimed by the Colorado Rockies. The Twins subsequently dropped Hernandez on the defending National League Champions, and the results so far have been predictable. Hernandez was an innings eater, something that may or may not come back to bite the Twins in the wallet, but whatever, he's not what you would call an ace or anything.
Let's compare Livan with the other four starters that comprised the Twins starting staff before he was cut free:
Pitcher
IP
K/G
BB/G
HR/G
xFIP
Livan
139.7
3.3
1.8
1.10
4.77
Baker
114.3
8.1
2.0
1.38
3.93
Blackburn
144.7
4.8
1.5
0.88
4.42
Perkins
110.7
4.5
2.3
1.04
4.88
Slowey
114.3
6.7
1.4
1.27
4.26
Yep, Livan can go out there, let the game get out of reach, and then pitch another five or six innings. If you can live with losing a lot of games when he's pitching, he can take a helluva a beating and prevent the bullpen from being further strained. So, there's that. Another thing is that his pitching wasn't that much worse than some of these younger starters. But, he's got a $5 million contract with bonuses based on innings pitched that could make it a $7 million contract. Hell, Boof Bonser had pitched better than Livan has (4.51 xFIP), and he's making about a half mil, and he's also been banished to the bullpen.
Let's look at that chart again with mystery player JW added in.
Pitcher
IP
K/G
BB/G
HR/G
xFIP
Livan
139.7
3.3
1.8
1.10
4.77
Baker
114.3
8.1
2.0
1.38
3.93
Blackburn
144.7
4.8
1.5
0.88
4.42
Perkins
110.7
4.5
2.3
1.04
4.88
Slowey
114.3
6.7
1.4
1.27
4.26
JW
135.7
5.0
2.6
1.03
4.96
Old JW doesn't miss many bats, although he kind of fits in with the Twins starters for most part in that category, he walks a few more than the Twins staff, and his home runs allowed are fairly low, but look at that xFIP -- 4.96. He's also making $10 million this year and next. Of course, he's Jarrod Washburn.
Seattle put Washburn on waivers and the Twins claimed him. Wow, what a risky move. Had Seattle just let him go, Washburn would have been the 7th best starter on the staff -- and he would also have been one of four guys making $10 million plus on the 2009 Twins (the studs Nathan, Morneau, and Mauer being the other three). Honestly, I was sick to my stomach worrying about this from the time I heard that the Twins had made a claim (apparently to block Washburn from going to the White Sox, or at least that's what I've heard) until I found out that he wasn't going to be a Twin.
Apparently, the Twins were in serious talks with the Mariners about Washburn. It should be pointed out that Washburn has sucked for a while -- his 4.96 xFIP is the best he's done in the past five years -- and there's absolutely no reason to believe, at the age of 34 (older than Livan, supposedly) that he'd get any better. The prudent course of action for the Mariners was to unload him to the Yankees at the deadline, but Seattle wasn't interested in that. Apparently, the Yankees weren't interested in Washburn anymore, either, since the Twins won the claim, despite having a better record than the Yankees. At this point, it should have been clear that the market for Washburn was practically non-existent. Merely dumping Washburn on the Twins would have saved the Mariners $13 million. Instead, though, the Mariners thought that they were dealing from a position of strength and wanted the Twins to take on Washburn's salary (which, inexplicably, the Twins were apparently willing to do, WTF, Billy Smith!) AND get this, give up one of their starters.
Luckily, the Twins were dealing with fools. Luckily, when the Twins backed away from the table, the Mariners didn't just dump Washburn on the Twins. Tomorrow night, Washburn will be in the Metrodome, but thankfully in a Mariners uniform. The Twins were playing with fire here. Billy, you just about got burned.
Game 114: Minnesota at Seattle
Game time: 3:40 PM CDT
Scheduled Starters: Nick Blackburn (23rd start 134 IP, 4.34 xFIP)
v. Jarrod Washburn (22rd start, 23rd appearance 122.7 IP, 4.97 xFIP)
The 2001 Minnesota Twins exploded onto the scene from nowhere and raced out to a 55-32 start and a five game lead at the All-Star Break. For those of us who had suffered through the dark days of the late 1990s, this was like a Great Spring after a long cold winter. Cue the George Harrison, friends, because Here Comes the Sun. Of course, there was an 800-lb. gorilla in the division known as the Cleveland Indians and eventually that still loaded team caught the Twins and won their sixth division title in seven years.
To be sure, the Twins did not fare well head-to-head against the Indians, going only 5-14 against the eventual division champs. And a 30-45 second half kind of showed that they didn't do all that well against anybody (and probably more than anything showed a regression to the mean). But, one series is seared in my memory as the one that killed their chances.
On Friday, August 10th, 2001, I was about two weeks from entering law school. I went on a final vacation trip before school started and the Twins headed to St. Petersburg, FL. Tampa Bay was their usual sucky selves (39-76) and the Twins were tied for first with Cleveland. The next series was a three gamer in Cleveland with three more at home against the Devil Rays. Man, we needed to make hay against the worst team in the league. Guess what? The Twins lostallfourgames. And then, three straight in Cleveland. And then two of three in Minnesota against the Rays. After that disastrous ten game run, the Twins were 4.5 games out. If the Twins had taken care of business against a putrid Rays team and gone 6-1 instead of 1-6, they might have won the division (actually that would have put them at 90 wins, one fewer than Cleveland ended up with). By my way of thinking, that four game sweep in St. Petersburg was the killer. I know, all 162 games count, blah, blah, blah. But, winning games against inferior opponents is called taking care of business. That's what the Twins did the next three years when they won division titles. They absolutely killed the bad teams.
It's only one game, but we've got to beat this team. We've got six more with them after today.
Wolves lose again by 22, Kevin Love down to 17 minutes. This is the worst possible situation for the Wolves. They are driving what is left of their fan base with a tremendous stretch of terrible basketball. Their best, or second-best, player has checked out and is getting buried on the bench. I doubt that Love is in their long term plans. How's that O.J. Mayo deal looking now?
DK wrote: O-Cab was a baseball band-aid over a severed limb. Acting like doing that was a "victory" is what seems foolish to me.
Rhubarb_Runner wrote: O-Cab lead the majors in Outs as a batter in 2009. Call me foolish.
Milt on Tilt wrote: This one move did not our season make. But to completely disregard it seems foolish as well.
Rhubarb_Runner wrote: 44And he preached in away games, wearing a Twins uniform.
I can see that line being used throughout the season's game logs, too.
Andrew wrote: This is definitely going into my Catcher-cisms collection.
DK wrote: I'm saying those two scenarios make no difference to me. Trading for one more bad player doesn't suddenly make Billy a success, to me, just because he had set himself up so badly before…
Milt on Tilt wrote: The Twins had a problem and Bill Smith addressed it. I don't know what else you wanted him to do. Obviously we would have been in a much better situation had he got O-Dog one…
brianS wrote: trading for Cabrera was genius for no other reason than New Guy's Orlando Ballgame schtick.
DK wrote: Cabrera was not good, objectively, before we got him, and he wasn't good after we got him. Therefore the only reason Billy Smith gets a "victory" for getting him was because he previously failed…
Klawitter wrote: My plan to contribute more often (than 2-3 time a year) is proceeding smashingly -- to the point where I have cracked the Top 50 LTE writers for 2010. Now that I am up…
spookymilk wrote: Well, there's your 'teen, SBG: Murray St. over Vanderbilt.
AMR wrote: Dear Vandy,
Did you get your "Disconnection … St.
SBG wrote: You should have overridden the computer because I'd think that UNC would be a safe bet. After all, they won it last year.
UncleWalt wrote: I was surprised by how many brackets have Kansas as the champ in the Basket and Ball Guys league. I annually pick the Tar Heels to go all the way, but the stupid yahoo computer…
AMR wrote: I'm Cheering for Murray St. over Vanderbilt for the Sonic Youth … On Tin!"
I can't remember what I put into my WGOM Bracket, I did two brackets at work after putting in my annual one…
spookymilk wrote: I've seen a handful of brackets blow up in the opening days, but yeah, I don't remember the first slate of games killing anyone. That would've given you a dubious … few years ago…
nibbish wrote: Well, obviously, but even the idea of a Jeter/Yankee fan controversy would be too good to pass up comment on, even if I have as good a chance of ending up on the Royals as…
DK wrote: I know we're all thinking about baseball and basketball right now, but how about this guy Clint Dempsey?
UncleWalt wrote: That would've crippled a lot of us, particularly Walt.
I saw that. I was wondering if three hours would have been some sort of record for the time from start of bracket to blowing it up.
brianS wrote: I dunno. But we're not really talking about a legal argument so much as an ethical one, I think.
Moss wrote: The old "you can't have your coke and snort it too" … can't get a conviction on a … test...and is possession of any amount of coke a felony??
Recent Letters to the Editor
In Response to Nightmares at WGOMville,
DK wrote: O-Cab was a baseball band-aid over a severed limb. Acting like doing that was a "victory" is what seems foolish to me.
Rhubarb_Runner wrote: O-Cab lead the majors in Outs as a batter in 2009. Call me foolish.
Milt on Tilt wrote: This one move did not our season make. But to completely disregard it seems foolish as well.
Rhubarb_Runner wrote: 44And he preached in away games, wearing a Twins uniform. I can see that line being used throughout the season's game logs, too.
Andrew wrote: This is definitely going into my Catcher-cisms collection.
DK wrote: I'm saying those two scenarios make no difference to me. Trading for one more bad player doesn't suddenly make Billy a success, to me, just because he had set himself up so badly before…
Milt on Tilt wrote: The Twins had a problem and Bill Smith addressed it. I don't know what else you wanted him to do. Obviously we would have been in a much better situation had he got O-Dog one…
brianS wrote: trading for Cabrera was genius for no other reason than New Guy's Orlando Ballgame schtick.
brianS wrote: Amen.
DK wrote: Cabrera was not good, objectively, before we got him, and he wasn't good after we got him. Therefore the only reason Billy Smith gets a "victory" for getting him was because he previously failed…
In Response to Cup of Coffee: March 18, 2010,
Klawitter wrote: My plan to contribute more often (than 2-3 time a year) is proceeding smashingly -- to the point where I have cracked the Top 50 LTE writers for 2010. Now that I am up…
spookymilk wrote: Well, there's your 'teen, SBG: Murray St. over Vanderbilt.
AMR wrote: Dear Vandy, Did you get your "Disconnection … St.
SBG wrote: You should have overridden the computer because I'd think that UNC would be a safe bet. After all, they won it last year.
UncleWalt wrote: I was surprised by how many brackets have Kansas as the champ in the Basket and Ball Guys league. I annually pick the Tar Heels to go all the way, but the stupid yahoo computer…
AMR wrote: I'm Cheering for Murray St. over Vanderbilt for the Sonic Youth … On Tin!" I can't remember what I put into my WGOM Bracket, I did two brackets at work after putting in my annual one…
spookymilk wrote: I've seen a handful of brackets blow up in the opening days, but yeah, I don't remember the first slate of games killing anyone. That would've given you a dubious … few years ago…
nibbish wrote: Well, obviously, but even the idea of a Jeter/Yankee fan controversy would be too good to pass up comment on, even if I have as good a chance of ending up on the Royals as…
DK wrote: I know we're all thinking about baseball and basketball right now, but how about this guy Clint Dempsey?
UncleWalt wrote: That would've crippled a lot of us, particularly Walt. I saw that. I was wondering if three hours would have been some sort of record for the time from start of bracket to blowing it up.
In Response to Luna - 23 Minutes In Brussels (Tell Me Do You Miss Me),
E-6 wrote: Love me some Luna.
In Response to Cup of Coffee: March 17, 2010,
brianS wrote: I dunno. But we're not really talking about a legal argument so much as an ethical one, I think.
Moss wrote: The old "you can't have your coke and snort it too" … can't get a conviction on a … test...and is possession of any amount of coke a felony??
hungry joe wrote: tell me about it...
brianS wrote: It is hard to consume if you do not possess.